Louisville vs Duke 
7-unit Louisville priced as a 6-point dog. 

From my predictive model that has evolved over the past 25 years, Louisville is expected to score 78 or more points and commit 12 or few turnovers. In past games when they met or exceeded these performance measures has seen them produce a highly profitable 13-3 SU and 15-1 ATS record for 93% winning bets since 2017.  

Louisville enters the semifinals fresh off a thrilling 76-73 victory over Clemson in the quarterfinals, showcasing resilience and clutch playmaking. Duke, meanwhile, survived a scare from North Carolina in a 74-71 win, but their path forward is clouded by injuries that could tilt the scales in Louisville’s favor. The Blue Devils won the regular-season meeting on December 8, 2024, 76-65, but the absence of key players and Louisville’s red-hot form suggest this semifinal could defy expectations. 

Duke is listed as a 5.5-point favorite with a total of 146 points, per the latest odds, but Louisville’s defensive tenacity and offensive firepower could make this a closer contest—or even a stunning upset—than the betting lines suggest. 

Key Matchups for a Louisville Upset 

Chucky Hepburn (Louisville) vs. Kon Knueppel (Duke) 

Why It Matters: With Duke’s superstar freshman Cooper Flagg sidelined (more on that below), freshman guard Kon Knueppel has stepped up as the Blue Devils’ offensive leader. Knueppel dropped 17 points against UNC in the semifinals and 28 against Georgia Tech in the quarterfinals, proving he can carry the load. However, Louisville’s senior guard Chucky Hepburn, a transfer from Wisconsin, is a defensive dynamo averaging 3.5 steals per game (second nationally) and a crafty scorer at 16.4 points per contest.  

Upset Factor: Hepburn’s ability to disrupt Knueppel’s rhythm with his quick hands and relentless pressure could neutralize Duke’s primary scoring threat. Offensively, Hepburn’s knack for clutch buckets—evidenced by his 20-point, eight-assist performance against Stanford in the quarters—could exploit Duke’s depleted backcourt depth. 

Terrence Edwards Jr. (Louisville) vs. Duke’s Frontcourt (Ven-Allen Lubin/Jae’Lyn Withers) 

Why It Matters: Edwards Jr., a senior guard averaging 16.1 points per game, has been a consistent scoring threat, dropping 21 points against Clemson and 25 against Stanford in the tournament. Duke’s frontcourt, featuring Ven-Allen Lubin and Jae’Lyn Withers, will try to clog the paint and limit Louisville’s interior attack, especially without Flagg’s rim protection.  

Upset Factor: Edwards’ versatility to score from mid-range and beyond the arc (he’s hit double figures in four straight games) could stretch Duke’s defense thin. If he penetrates and forces Duke’s bigs into foul trouble, Louisville’s supporting cast—like J’Vonne Hadley (7.3 rebounds per game)—could dominate the glass and second-chance opportunities. 

Louisville’s Perimeter Shooting vs. Duke’s Adjusted Defense 

Why It Matters: Louisville ranks seventh nationally with 31.6 three-point attempts per game, led by sharpshooter Reyne Smith (3.5 threes per game, 12.5 points). Duke’s defense, ranked No. 1 in adjusted efficiency by KenPom earlier this season, has been elite at limiting opponents to 61.6 points per game. However, injuries have forced adjustments, and UNC exposed cracks by nearly rallying late.  

Upset Factor: If Smith and Hepburn get hot from deep, Louisville could force Duke to overextend, opening driving lanes and creating chaos. The Cardinals’ 43.2% three-point shooting over their last five games suggests they’re peaking at the right time. 

Duke’s Significant Injuries and Impact 

Duke’s biggest blow is the loss of freshman phenom Cooper Flagg, who suffered an ankle injury in the quarterfinals against Georgia Tech and is out indefinitely. Flagg, averaging 18.9 points and 7.5 rebounds per game, was the heart of Duke’s offense and defense. His absence removes a dominant two-way presence, leaving the Blue Devils vulnerable to Louisville’s guard-heavy attack and rebounding tenacity. Without Flagg’s shot-blocking (two per game) and scoring versatility, Duke’s margin for error shrinks dramatically. 

Additionally, Duke has dealt with nagging injuries throughout the season. Senior guard Jeremy Roach, who eclipsed 1,000 career points earlier this year, has been managing a lingering knee issue, limiting his explosiveness (14 points per game average). While he’s expected to play, his reduced mobility could be exploited by Hepburn’s quickness. The Blue Devils’ depth is further tested with Kasean Pryor, a key forward for Louisville in the regular season, already out for the year with a torn ACL—an injury that indirectly impacts this matchup by forcing Duke to face a retooled, guard-centric Cardinals squad. 

Impact: Flagg’s absence shifts the burden to Knueppel and Roach, but Duke’s frontcourt lacks the athleticism and versatility to match Louisville’s pace without him. The Blue Devils’ 90% win rate as favorites (27-2) could be in jeopardy as their depleted roster faces a Cardinals team firing on all cylinders. 

Last 10 Games: Straight-Up (SU) and Against the Spread (ATS) Records 

Louisville Cardinals 

SU: 10-0 – The Cardinals have won 11 straight, including their last 10, with victories over ranked foes like No. 14 Indiana and close calls against Stanford and Clemson in the tournament.  

ATS: 6-4 – Louisville has covered in six of their last 10, including five straight against Duke historically. Their 19-13 ATS record this season reflects their ability to keep games competitive or exceed expectations as underdogs. 

Duke Blue Devils 

SU: 9-1 – Duke’s only loss in their last 10 came against Pitt on January 20, 2025 (80-76). They’ve won 26 of their last 27, but Flagg’s injury clouds their recent dominance.  

ATS: 7-3 – The Blue Devils are 7-3 ATS in their last 10, with a 21-11 ATS mark overall. However, they’re just 11-6 ATS at home and 9-2 on the road, suggesting vulnerability in neutral-site games like this. 

Takeaway: Louisville’s perfect SU run and historical ATS edge against Duke (covering in four of the last six meetings) signal they’re built for an upset. Duke’s ATS success as a favorite (63.3% when favored by 5.5 or more) may falter without Flagg. 

Coaching Trends Favoring Louisville 

First-year head coach Pat Kelsey has transformed Louisville into a defensive juggernaut and offensive machine in just months, a stark contrast to the program’s struggles under Kenny Payne. Kelsey’s track record at Charleston—where he built high-octane, guard-led teams—translates perfectly to this roster. His teams have a knack for peaking late, as evidenced by Louisville’s 21-1 record in their last 22 games. Kelsey’s ability to adjust after losing Kasean Pryor midseason (post-December 8 Duke loss) has been masterful, with a +4.9 rebounding margin and 16.6 forced turnovers per game fueling their surge. 

Duke’s Jon Scheyer, in his third year, boasts a 60-15 record and has won eight of 11 against Louisville, including five straight. However, his reliance on young stars like Flagg and Knueppel has been exposed by injuries. Scheyer’s teams have struggled ATS in big games without full health (1-2 ATS in last three as favorites without Flagg), and his 2023-24 squad lost its first ACC home game in two years to Pitt—a sign of vulnerability under pressure. 

Upset Edge: Kelsey’s adaptability and defensive emphasis outshine Scheyer’s talent-dependent system when Duke is shorthanded. Louisville’s 66% ATS mark in ACC play under Kelsey (14-7) trumps Duke’s reliance on Flagg’s now-absent star power. 

Bethune-Cookman vs. Jackson State  
Friday, 03/14/2025 8:30 PM 
7-Unit bet on Bethune-Cookman priced as a 3.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 62-30 ATS record 67% winning bets since 2020. The requirements are: 

Bet on any team avenging a double-digit home loss. 

Our team has won 51 to 60% of their games. 

The opponent has a losing record. 

Clippers vs Hawkes 
7-Unit bet on the Clippers priced as 4.5-point favorites. 

The following NBA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 159-49 SU 76% record and a 121-85-2 ATS record good for 59% winning bets since 1995. The requirements are: •Bet on road favorites in the second half of the season. •That road team is allowing 45 to 47.5% shooting, •The home team is allowing 47.5% or better shooting. •Both teams have posted a rebounding different between +3 and -3. If our road team is priced between a 6.5 and 9.5-point favorite, they soar to an impressive 47-5 SU and 35-17 ATS mark good for 67% winning bets. 

If the game is a matchup of non-conference foes, our teams have gone 56-16 SU and 44-27-1 ATS good for 62% winning bets.  

Bethane-Cookman vs Alcorn State 
7-Unit bet on Bethane-Cookman priced as a 3.5-point favorite. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 43-17 SU and 36-21-3 ATS record for 63% winning bets since 2010. The requirements needed to create an active betting opportunity are:  

Bet on a home or neutral court favorite.  

This is the third meeting between the teams.  

In the last meeting our home team lost at home and were priced as the favorite.  

They lost the second-to-last meeting too. 

Kennesaw State vs New Mexico State 
7-Unit bet on Kennesaw State using the money line priced as a 1.5-point favorite. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced solid results with a 19-10 and 128-11 ATS record good for 62% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on any team that has seen their last 10 games play UNDER the total by a combined total of 60 or more points. 

The total is priced between 130 and 139.5 points. 

The team is priced between pick-em and 4.5-points. 

Texas Southern vs Alabama State 
7-Unit bet on TX Southern using the money line priced as a 1.5-point favorite. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced solid results with a 19-10 and 128-11 ATS record good for 62% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on any team that has seen their last 10 games play UNDER the total by a combined total of 60 or more points. 

The total is priced between 130 and 139.5 points. 

The team is priced between pick-em and 4.5-points. 

Bethane-Cookman vs Alcorn State 
7-Unit bet on Bethane-Cookman priced as a 3.5-point favorite. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 43-17 SU and 36-21-3 ATS record for 63% winning bets since 2010. The requirements needed to create an active betting opportunity are:  

Bet on a home or neutral court favorite.  

This is the third meeting between the teams.  

In the last meeting our home team lost at home and were priced as the favorite.  

They lost the second-to-last meeting too. 

No. 25 Marquette vs Xavier 
7-Unit bet on Marquette priced as a 2.5-point favorite. 
2:30 EST | Peacock 
Madison Square Garden 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 20-11 SUATS record good for 65% winning bets since 2015.  

Bet on favorites priced between pick-em and 4.5-points. 

They lost to the current foe in the same season priced as the favorite. 

The foe is coming off a win but failed to cover the spread. 

Ohio vs Toldeo 
7-Unit bet on Toledo priced as a 3.5-point underdog. 
MAC Quarterfinals 
1:30 PM EST | ESPN+ 
Rocket Arena, Cleveland, Ohio 

The Mid-American Conference (MAC) Tournament quarterfinals tip off today in Cleveland, and the Toledo Rockets are set to clash with the Ohio Bobcats in a showdown that’s dripping with postseason stakes. It’s a neutral-site slugfest at Rocket Mortgage FieldHouse, where the winner punches their ticket to Friday’s semifinals—and keeps their NCAA Tournament dreams alive. Toledo’s looking to ride their late-season surge, while Ohio aims to flip the script after a rocky finish. Buckle up—this one’s got all the makings of a MACtion classic. 

The Matchup 

Toledo (17-14, 10-8 MAC) snagged the No. 4 seed after a 7-3 sprint over their last 10 games, including a 77-64 thumping of Ohio on February 11. The Rockets lean on a balanced attack—five players average double figures—paced by junior guard Sonny Wilson (14.8 PPG) and his 37.8% three-point clip. Their defense, ranked third in the MAC (71.2 PPG allowed), thrives on forcing turnovers (12.5 per game), a stat that could haunt Ohio’s ball-handlers. 

Ohio (16-15, 10-8 MAC), the No. 5 seed, stumbled into the tournament, dropping three of their last four, including an 83-74 loss to Toledo last week that sealed their seeding fate. But don’t count out the Bobcats—they’ve got firepower in senior guard Jaylen Hunter (15.2 PPG, 4.8 APG), whose playmaking could spark an upset. Ohio’s offense hums at 77.8 PPG (fourth in the MAC), but their defense (75.2 PPG allowed) has been leaky lately, a vulnerability Toledo’s poised to exploit. 

Key Factors 

Toledo’s Revenge Edge: The Rockets already beat Ohio twice this season—83-74 on March 7 and 77-64 on February 11—both times capitalizing on Ohio’s 14+ turnovers. If Toledo’s D forces mistakes again, it’s lights out for the Bobcats.  

Ohio’s Three-Point Threat: Ohio jacks up 24.6 threes per game (37.2% clip), and Hunter’s 40.2% from deep could stretch Toledo’s defense thin. If they get hot, this game flips fast.  

Neutral-Site X-Factor: Cleveland’s a home away from home for both squads, but Toledo’s 7-5 road/neutral record edges Ohio’s 5-8. The Rockets’ composure could be the difference. 

 
NCAA Basketball Algorithm 
This NCAA hoops betting algorithm is a certified cash machine, rocking a 14-13 straight-up record and a sizzling 18-7-2 ATS clip for a jaw-dropping 72% winning bets! It’s been lighting up the scoreboard, and I’m here to spill the tea on why it’s screaming “Toledo” for this MAC quarterfinal. Here’s the secret sauce that’s got me buzzing:  

We’re betting on a team with a winning record—like Toledo’s 17-14—strutting their stuff on a neutral court. Cleveland’s Rocket Mortgage FieldHouse? Check!  

Our squad’s priced at pick-em or any size underdog—Toledo’s hovering near even odds or a slight ‘dog, making this a juicy play.  

The opponent’s won 51-60% of their games—Ohio’s 16-15 (51.6%) fits like a glove.  

The foe’s been a spread-busting disaster, losing by 18+ points ATS over their last three—Ohio’s dropped stinkers like 83-74 to Toledo (spread miss) and 88-70 to Akron, trending toward collapse. 

This isn’t just a hunch—it’s a neon-lit roadmap to riches, and Toledo’s the golden ticket to cash in on this chaos. Bet the Rockets to cover and watch the algorithm work its magic! 

Hornets vs Hawks 
7-Unit bet on Hornets priced as 8-point underdogs. 
The following betting algorithm has produced a 22-43 SU (34%) SU record and a 41-23-1 ATS mark for 64% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on a road underdog that has won 25 to 40% of their games. •That dog is priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. •That dog has seen the total play Under by 48 or more points spanning their previous 10 games. If the game has a total of 220 or fewer points, these road dogs have produced a highly profitable 23-8-1 ATS for 74% winning bets 

Sam Houston State vs UTEP 
USA Conference Championship Game 
Winner get a ticket to the NCAA Tournament. 
10-Unit bet on Sam Houston State priced as a 1.5-point underdog. 

I recommend taking the 1.5 points as opposed to the money line. If SHST moves to a favorite, then use the money line up to a 2.5-point favorite. 

I’m throwing down a confident 10-unit bet on the Sam Houston State Bearkats, who are stepping into this clash as 1.5-point underdogs. Let’s break down why this is the play to make and how you can cash in. 

Betting Strategy: Grab the Points and Ride the Edge 

Here’s the move—take Sam Houston State with the 1.5 points instead of the moneyline. Why? It’s a safety net for a game that could come down to the wire. But keep your eyes peeled: if the Bearkats flip to favorites, switch to the moneyline as long as they’re giving up no more than 2.5 points. This flexibility keeps you in the driver’s seat, no matter how the odds shift. 

The Secret Sauce: A Winning Algorithm That Delivers 

This isn’t a gut call—it’s backed by a battle-tested NCAA basketball betting system that’s been crushing it since 2014. We’re talking an 11-4 record on decisive scoring upsets (DSU) and a jaw-dropping 12-3 against the spread (ATS)—that’s an 80%-win rate! Want in on the magic? Here’s what triggers this golden betting opportunity:  

Our team (Sam Houston) is averaging 74-78 points per game—check.  

Their opponent (UTEP) is giving up 67-74 points per game—check.  

It’s a neutral-court battle—yep, Huntsville, Alabama fits the bill.  

The over/under sits between 140 and 149.5 points—right in the sweet spot.  

Sam Houston just dropped 45+ points in a half in their last game—confirmed.  

We’re past the 15th game of the season, and this is postseason action—double check! 

When these stars align, the algorithm says, “bet it,” and history says, “win it.” Sam Houston’s clicking on all cylinders, and UTEP’s defense might not have the juice to slow them down. So, grab those 1.5 points, root for the Bearkats, and get ready to celebrate as they punch their NCAA Tournament ticket—and maybe pad your wallet while they’re at it! 

From the Predictive Model: The numbers say SHST is primed to light it up, shooting 38% or better from three-point land while crashing the boards for at least five more rebounds than UTEP. And here’s the kicker: when the Bearkats have hit these marks over the past five seasons, they’ve been nearly unstoppable—racking up a 30-0 straight-up record and a ridiculous 22-2-1 against the spread. That’s a jaw-dropping 92%-win rate on bets! If Sam Houston brings the long-range heat and owns the glass, UTEP might be left staring at a stat sheet full of bad news—and SHST could be dancing their way to the NCAA Tournament. 

Lakers vs Nets 
7-Unit bet on the Lakers priced as 8-point road favorites. 

The following NBA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 127-39 SU 77% record and a 100-64-2 ATS record good for 61% winning bets since 1995. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorites in the second half of the season.  

That road team is allowing 45 to 47.5% shooting,  

The home team is allowing 47.5% or better shooting.  

Both teams have posted a rebounding different between +3 and -3.  

If our road team is priced between a 6.5 and 9.5-point favorite and facing a foe that is riding a 5 or more-game losing streak, our team has gone 10-1 SU and 9-2 ATS good for 82% winning bets. 

Delaware vs Towson State 
7-Unit bet on Delaware priced as a 5.5-point underdog. 

The following best bet is reinforced by thsi outstanding and highly profitable bettig algorithm that has produced a 12-12 SU record and 15-9 ATS mark good for 63% winning bets. The requirements needed are: 

The game take place on a neutral site. 

One of the teams is coming off an ATS win by 25 or more points. 

The opponent has seen their last 10 games play OVER the total by 55 or more points.  

If the game is part of a conference tournament, these dogs have gone 7-1 ATS for 88% winning bets.  

The following best bet is reinforced by this outstanding and highly profitable betting algorithm that has produced a 24-15 SU record and 26-12-1 ATS mark good for 68.4% winning bets. The requirements needed are: 

Bet on a team that is scoring between 74 and 78 PPG. 

The game occurs after game 20 of the season. 

The total is priced between 135 and 150 points. 

The opponent allows an average of 67 to 76 PPG. 

Our team is coming off a game scoring 40 or more points in the first half. 

The game in being played on a neutral court. 

Arkansas State vs South Alabama 
Sun Belt Conference Semifinals 
7-Unit Bet (ranging from 3-Units to 10-Units)  on Arkansas State as a 4.5-point favorite. 

Arkansas State vs. South Alabama! I’m slamming a confident 7-unit bet—smack in the middle of my 3-to-10-unit range—on Arkansas State, who’s strutting in as a 4.5-point favorite. This isn’t just a wild hunch; it’s backed by a betting algorithm that’s been torching the NCAA hardwood like a sharpshooter on fire! 

This system’s a certified beast, racking up a 43-17 straight-up record and a silky 36-21-3 against-the-spread mark, cashing 63% of bets since 2010. It’s like having a courtside oracle whispering winners in your ear! Here’s the magic recipe that’s got me buzzing: 

 
We’re betting on a home or neutral-court favorite—check, Arkansas State’s got this in the bag on the Sun Belt’s big stage. This has to be the third showdown between these squads—yep, they’ve tangoed twice already. In their last meeting, Arkansas State got stung at home as the favorite, leaving a bitter taste. And here’s the kicker—they dropped the second-to-last game too, piling on the motivation to flip the script. 

 
Imagine this: Arkansas State’s coming out swinging, fueled by revenge and ready to bury South Alabama under a barrage of buckets. The Red Wolves are primed to howl their way to the finals, while the Jaguars are staring down a redemption-or-bust moment. This algorithm’s screaming “Arkansas State’s got the edge!” So, grab your rally towel, place that bet, and brace yourself for a semifinal smackdown that’ll have the Sun Belt faithful roaring! 

UAB vs Tulane 
7-Unit Bet on UAB priced as a 3.5-point underdog. 

UAB vs. Tulane! I’ve got my eyes locked on an upset brewing, with UAB poised to flip the script as the home underdog. Why? Because I’m armed with a betting algorithm that’s been sniffing out chaos like a bloodhound on a hot trail, and it’s screaming that the Blazers could torch the Green Wave in this one! 

This system’s a wild card, posting a 124-224 straight-up record (36%) but a dazzling 200-143-4 against-the-spread mark, hitting 58% of bets since 2006. It’s like finding gold in the underdog mines! Here’s the electrifying recipe that’s got me hyped for UAB’s upset shot: 

We’re betting on home underdogs (or pick ‘em)—check, UAB’s got the home-court fire in Birmingham. The game’s gotta be No. 16 or later in the season—yep, we’re deep enough in March 2025 for that. UAB’s averaging between 67 and 74 points per game—right in their sweet spot of scrappy, controlled chaos. Tulane, meanwhile, is a high-octane machine, dropping 78 or more points per game—they’re fast, but maybe too flashy. The Green Wave are also stumbling in after two straight OVER results, meaning their defense might be leakier than a busted hoop net. And here’s the jackpot: if Tulane’s licking wounds from a home loss, UAB’s upset magic spikes to a jaw-dropping 26-21 SU and 34-13 ATS, cashing 72% of bets! 

Why UAB Can Pull the Upset 

Picture this: UAB’s got the crowd roaring at Bartow Arena, feeding off that underdog energy. They play gritty, grind-it-out ball—think tenacious D and just enough buckets to keep it close. Tulane’s riding high, but their run-and-gun style could crash hard against UAB’s homegrown hustle, especially if they’re sloppy after those OVERS or deflated from a home L. The Blazers don’t need to outscore Tulane’s fireworks—they just need to muck it up, keep it tight, and strike late. That 58% ATS win rate says they cover, and that 36% SU upset clip hints they could outright steal it. 

This is David vs. Goliath with a Southern twist! UAB’s got the recipe—home pride, a stingy pace, and Tulane’s potential hangover—to shock the Green Wave. So, crank up the volume, place your bet, and watch the Blazers ignite an upset that’ll have the Sun Belt buzzing! 

Oregon vs Washington 
7-Unit Bet on Oregon priced as an 7.5-point favorite. 

Get ready to hoop it up, basketball junkies, because we’re crashing the court for an epic Big Ten showdown: Oregon vs. Washington! I’m dropping a massive 7-unit bet on the Ducks, who are strutting into enemy territory as 7.5-point favorites. Why am I riding with Oregon like they’re the last chopper out of a war zone? Because I’ve got a betting algorithm that’s been schooling underdogs uglier than a busted jump shot for nearly 20 years! 

This isn’t just some hunch—it’s a hardwood-honed juggernaut with a dazzling 492-146 straight-up record and a slick 374-252-12 against-the-spread tally, nailing 60% of bets since 2006. It’s like having a cheat code for the sportsbook! Here’s the playbook that’s got me hyped: 

We’re locking in on a road favorite priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points—bam, Oregon’s 8.5 fits like a glove. Washington’s got to be limping off three straight losses to Big Ten bullies—check, they’ve been dunked on by conference foes. They’re also itching to settle a score after Oregon torched them earlier this season—revenge is sweet, but it’s a tough ask. And here’s the clincher: the Huskies have had equal or more rest, so no excuses—they’re just ripe for the picking. 

Picture this: Oregon’s swooping in with swagger, draining threes and locking down the paint, while Washington’s stuck in a slump deeper than a missed free throw in crunch time. This algorithm’s screaming “Ducks dominate!” So, snag your courtside snacks, place that bet, and watch Oregon fly high—because this system’s got them soaring to a victory that’ll have the scoreboard buzzing! 

Nuggets vs Thunder 
7-Unit bet on the OKC Thunder priced as 7.5-point favorites. 
The following NBA betting algorithm has done very well posting a 97-36 SU and 89-41-3 ATS record for 69% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are: ØBet on home teams. ØThat home team has allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games. ØThe opponent is coming off a game in which they scored 120 or more points. If the opponent is coming off a loss, our home team soar to a highly profitable 16-4 SU and 15-5 ATS record for 75% winning bets over the past five seasons. 

Betting on teams that have allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games and now facing a foe that scored 120 or more points in their previous game have gone 132-103 SU (56%) and 134-97-4 ATS for 58% winning bets over the past five seasons. Now, if our team is playing at home, then the five-season record went 84-35 SU and 78-38-5 ATS (67.2%). Playing at home and being favored by not more than 8 points has produced a 39-8 SU record and a 32-13-2 ATS mark for 71% winning bets. 

North Dakota vs South Dakota State 
7-Unit bet on North Dakota priced as a 7-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball sports betting algorithm has done extremely well producing a 12-107 SU (10%) and a 73-45-1 ATS mark good for 62% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are:  

Bet on underdog priced at 8.5 or more points.  

The dog is coming off a double-digit loss to a conference foe.  

The favorite is coming off a road loss priced as the favorite.  

If the average points scored by both teams is less than the posted total and the game number is 15 or more in the current season, these dogs have gone 27-11-1 ATS for 71% winning bets. 

ime: 9:30 p.m. EST 
Location: Denny Sanford Premier Center, Sioux Falls, SD 
Watch: Summit League Network  

Tonight, the Summit League Tournament quarterfinals heat up as the No. 7 seed North Dakota Fighting Hawks (11-20, 5-11 Summit League) take on the No. 2 seed South Dakota State Jackrabbits (20-11, 11-5 Summit League) in Sioux Falls. This matchup marks the third meeting between these two teams this season, with the Jackrabbits holding a 2-0 edge after victories in the regular season. However, tournament basketball is a different beast, and North Dakota has a chance to pull off a stunning upset against a South Dakota State team favored to make a deep run. Here’s a preview of the game and the key matchups that could tilt the scales in favor of the Fighting Hawks. 

The Stakes 

South Dakota State enters as a strong contender, boasting an 11-5 record in Summit League play and a reputation for stout defense, allowing just 73.1 points per game while holding opponents to 42.4% shooting. The Jackrabbits are led by a balanced attack and a potent 3-point game, averaging 8.8 makes from beyond the arc. For North Dakota, the season has been a struggle at 11-20 overall, but their 5-11 conference mark still earned them a spot in the tournament. The Fighting Hawks will need to channel their offensive firepower—they average 77.3 points per game—and exploit key mismatches to shock the Jackrabbits and advance to the semifinals. 

Key Matchups for a North Dakota Upset 

Treysen Eaglestaff (North Dakota) vs. South Dakota State’s Perimeter Defense 
North Dakota’s sophomore guard Treysen Eaglestaff has been a bright spot, averaging 15.1 points per game and shooting 38.5% from 3-point range. His ability to stretch the floor will be critical against a Jackrabbits defense that excels at clamping down on shooters. South Dakota State allows 8.8 threes per game, matching North Dakota’s output, which sets up a shootout. If Eaglestaff gets hot early and forces the Jackrabbits to overcommit, it could open driving lanes for his teammates. The upset hinges on him winning this battle and exposing any cracks in SDSU’s perimeter discipline. 

B.J. Omot (North Dakota) vs. Luke Appel (South Dakota State) 
North Dakota’s B.J. Omot, a 6’8” forward averaging 14.8 points and 4.5 rebounds, brings versatility that could disrupt South Dakota State’s frontcourt. He’ll likely face off against Luke Appel, a senior forward for the Jackrabbits who averages 13.2 points and 5.1 rebounds. Appel’s physicality and scoring inside (where SDSU ranks second in the Summit League in points in the paint) will test Omot’s defensive chops. However, Omot’s ability to step out and hit mid-range jumpers or attack off the dribble could pull Appel away from the basket, creating space for North Dakota’s offense. If Omot outscores and outmaneuvers Appel, it’s a massive step toward an upset. 

North Dakota’s Pace vs. South Dakota State’s Defensive Tempo 
The Fighting Hawks play at a faster clip, ranking sixth in the Summit League with 77.3 points per game, while South Dakota State prefers a controlled, defensive-minded game. North Dakota must dictate the tempo, pushing the ball in transition to catch the Jackrabbits off guard. SDSU’s 42.4% field goal defense is formidable, but it’s less effective when opponents speed them up. If North Dakota’s guards—Eaglestaff and Tyree Ihenacho (10.2 points, 3.9 assists)—can ignite fast breaks and force turnovers (SDSU averages 11.5 per game), they could turn this into a track meet where the Jackrabbits’ discipline falters. 

Upset Potential 

South Dakota State is the clear favorite, with a deeper roster and home-state advantage in Sioux Falls. Their 20-11 record reflects consistency, and players like Zeke Mayo (17.5 points per game) and William Kyle III (12.8 points, 6.5 rebounds) give them multiple scoring threats. However, North Dakota has the tools to make this a game. The Fighting Hawks shoot 43.2% from the field, slightly above SDSU’s defensive average, and their desperation as underdogs could fuel a fearless performance. If they hit early shots, crash the boards (where they’ll need to counter SDSU’s 35.2 rebounds per game), and avoid long scoring droughts, they’ve got a puncher’s chance. 

Prediction 

This game screams classic tournament chaos. South Dakota State should win based on talent and experience, but North Dakota’s nothing-to-lose mentality and offensive spark could keep it close. For the upset to happen, Eaglestaff and Omot need to combine for 35+ points, and the Fighting Hawks must force 12+ turnovers. Expect a gritty battle, with South Dakota State pulling away late unless North Dakota catches fire from deep. 

Warriors vs Nets 
7-Unit bet on the Warriors priced as 10.5-point favorites. 

The following NBA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 127-39 SU 77% record and a 100-64-2 ATS record good for 61% winning bets since 1995. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorites in the second half of the season.  

That road team is allowing 45 to 47.5% shooting,  

The home team is allowing 47.5% or better shooting.  

Both teams have posted a rebounding different between +3 and -3.  

If our road team is priced between a 6.5 and 9.5-point favorite, they soar to an impressive 47-5 SU and 35-17 ATS mark good for 67% winning bets. 

If our team is favored by 7.5 or more points, they have gone 67-4 SU and 49-21 ATS for 70% winning bets. 

Bulls vs Magic 
7-Unit bet on the Bulls priced as 7-point underdogs. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has earned a 44-62 SU and 68-37-1 ATS record good for 65% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on road teams avenging a same-season loss.  

That road team is coming off a double-digit home loss.  

The game occurs after the all-star break. 

 
Team Dynamics: Bulls’ Offense vs. Magic’s Defense 

The Bulls enter tonight averaging 116.5 points per game (10th in the NBA) and excelling from beyond the arc with 15.9 three-pointers made per game (3rd in the league) at a 36.8% clip (10th). This offensive potency could exploit Orlando’s well-documented struggles on that end of the floor. The Magic rank dead last in the NBA in scoring (104.0 PPG), three-pointers made (10.8), and three-point percentage (30.5%). While Orlando boasts the league’s best defense (105.7 PPG allowed), their recent slide—coupled with a lack of offensive rhythm—could leave them vulnerable to Chicago’s faster-paced, perimeter-oriented attack. 

Chicago’s ability to push the tempo and capitalize on Orlando’s fourth-worst rebounding (41.9 RPG) could further widen the gap. The Bulls, averaging 45.2 rebounds per game (9th in the NBA), have a chance to dominate second-chance opportunities, especially if Orlando’s frontcourt depth is tested. The Magic’s defensive identity has kept them in games, but their offensive woes might not keep pace with a Bulls team desperate to snap out of their funk. 

Key Player Matchups Favoring the Bulls 

Coby White (Bulls) vs. Anthony Black (Magic) 
Coby White has been a revelation for Chicago, averaging 18.2 points per game and coming off a 25-point outburst against Cleveland. His recent form—scoring 21+ points in his last three games—makes him a matchup nightmare for Orlando’s Anthony Black (9.1 PPG, 3.2 APG). White’s quickness and ability to shoot from deep (38.0% from three) could overwhelm Black, who’s still finding his footing as a young guard. If White gets hot early, he could dictate the game’s tempo and pull Orlando’s defense out of position. 

Josh Giddey (Bulls) vs. Kentavious Caldwell-Pope (Magic) 
Josh Giddey’s versatility (13.2 PPG, 7.5 RPG, 6.6 APG) gives the Bulls an edge over Orlando’s Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, a defensive stalwart but limited offensive contributor. Giddey’s playmaking and rebounding prowess—he’s hit 18+ points in his last six games—could exploit KCP’s focus on perimeter defense. If Giddey penetrates and dishes to open shooters or crashes the boards, Chicago could rack up extra possessions against a Magic team that struggles to generate offense. 

Jalen Smith (Bulls) vs. Wendell Carter Jr. (Magic) 
With Nikola Vucevic doubtful (calf), the Bulls’ frontcourt depth takes center stage. Jalen Smith (8.3 PPG, 5.4 RPG) brings energy off the bench, as evidenced by his recent double-double (13 points, 11 rebounds) in limited minutes. Wendell Carter Jr. (9.0 PPG, 7.5 RPG) is a solid defender for Orlando, but his modest scoring output might not match Smith’s hustle. If Smith capitalizes on second-chance points or draws Carter out of the paint, the Bulls could feast inside against a potentially depleted Magic rotation. 

Talen Horton-Tucker (Bulls Bench) vs. Magic Depth 
Chicago’s bench could be the X-factor, with Talen Horton-Tucker (22 points vs. Cleveland) providing a spark. Orlando’s depth has been hit hard by injuries this season, and their reliance on starters like Paolo Banchero (23.6 PPG) and Franz Wagner (25.0 PPG) might not hold up if the Bulls’ reserves keep the pressure on. Horton-Tucker’s scoring punch could expose Orlando’s thinner second unit, especially if the Magic’s stars tire late. 

Why the Bulls Could Upset the Magic 

The Bulls’ path to victory hinges on their ability to turn this into a shootout. Orlando’s elite defense thrives in low-scoring, grind-it-out games, but their offense lacks the firepower to keep up if Chicago’s shooters catch fire. The Magic’s recent 133-119 win over the Bulls on November 27 showed their potential when clicking, but without Banchero in that game, they leaned on depth that’s since been inconsistent. Chicago’s 5-2 ATS record in their last seven games suggests they’ve been competitive as underdogs, while Orlando’s 1-4 ATS mark in their last five hints at vulnerability. 

If the Bulls exploit Orlando’s poor three-point shooting and rebounding, lean on White and Giddey to control the pace, and get contributions from their bench, they could steal this one on the road. Prediction: Bulls 112, Magic 108—a gritty upset fueled by Chicago’s offense outpacing Orlando’s defensive resolve. 

Mavericks vs Bucks 
7-Unit bet on the Mavericks priced as a 10-point underdog. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 13-28 SU record (28%) and a 29-11-1 ATS marl good for 73% winning bets since 2017.  

Bet on road underdogs priced between 7 and 14 points.  

They are coming off a home loss by 20 or more points.  

They lost the previous meeting to the current opponent by double-digits.  

If a divisional matchup, these dogs play hard and have earned a 5-11 SU and 12-4 ATS record good for 75% winning bets since 2017. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has gone 123-196 SU (39%) and 192-124-3 ATS for 61% winning bets since 2016. The requirements are:  

Bet on road teams avenging a same-season loss.  

The road team is coming off a double-digit home loss.  

If our team has won seven or more games of their previous 10, they soar to a remarkable 12-8 SU and 15-5 ATS for 75% winning bets. 

Knicks vs Heat 
7-Unit bet on the Knicks priced as a 6.5-point favorite. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a solid 147-51 SU (74%) and 121-72-5 ATS mark good for 63% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on favorites priced between 3.5 and 7.5 points.  

That team has seen the total play Under by 35 or more points spanning their previous three games. 

The game occurs in the second half of the regular season and the playoffs.  

If our favorite has the better true shooting percentage they improve significantly to a 108-34 SU (76%) and 92-46-4 ATS record good for 67% winning bets since 2018. 

Nets vs Pistons 
7-Unit bet on the Nets priced as 11.5-point underdogs. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 8=17 SU (32%) and 19-6 ATS good for 76% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are:  

Bet on road underdogs.  

The game occurs in the second half of the regular season.  

Our dog has seen the total play Under by 58 or more points over their last 10 games.  

The opponent has covered the spread by 75 or more points over their previous 10 games.  

If a conference road dog, our team has gone 14-4 ATS for 78% winning bets. 

Clippers vs Lakers 
7-Unit bet on the Lakers priced as 4-point underdogs. 

The Lakers defeated and covered against the Wolves last night and was my 10-UNIT MAX bet of the month winner. Doncic is adding tremendous energy and exciting for the Lakers and it will carry over to this game too. 

The line will adjust if he is given a night off or if Lebron get s pass, so the bet is valid and I woiuld make it close to the tip. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has done very well posting a 97-36 SU and 89-41-3 ATS record for 69% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on home teams.  

That home team has allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games.  

The opponent is coming off a game in which they scored 120 or more points.  

If the opponent is coming off a loss, our home team soars to a highly profitable 16-4 SU and 15-5 ATS record for 75% winning bets over the past five seasons. 

Kent State vs Akron 
7-Unit bet on Akron priced as a 3.5-point favorite. 

The following sports betting algorithm has produced an exceptional 28-6 and 25-9 SATS record good for 74% winning bets since 2020. The requirements are: 

Bet on home favorites priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. 

That favorite has lost to the spread by 24 or more points over their previous three games. 

The dog has seen their last five games go OVER by a combined 42 or more points. 

The favorite lost to the spread by less than 10 points. 

Princeton vs Columbia 
7-Unit bet on Princeton priced as a 4.5-point favorite. 

Let’s start with a sports betting algorithm that has done extremely well in facing ugly looking underdogs over many seasons. The algorithm has produced a 492-146 SU record and a solid 374-252-12 ATS mark good for 60% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorite priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

The host has lost three consecutive games to conference foes.  

The host is avenging a same-season loss.  

The host is playing on the same or more rest.  

If the favorite has won the last five meetings against this host, they have gone on to a 118-27 SU (81%) and 96-47-2 ATS mark good for 67% winning bets.  

Mount St. Mary’s vs Fairfield 
7-Unit bet on Fairfield priced as a 2.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 36-15 SUATS record good for 71% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are:  

Bet on a team priced between the 3’s.  

That team is averaging 67 to 74 PPG.  

The opponent is also averaging 67 to 74 PPG.  

Our team led their previous game by 20 or more points at the half.  

The game is the 18th or more of the season 

Vermont vs New Jersey Institute of Technology 
7-unit bet on Vermont priced as an 8.5-point favorite. 

Let’s start with a sports betting algorithm that has done extremely well in facing ugly looking underdogs over many seasons. The algorithm has produced a 285-79 SU record and a solid 205-155-4 ATS mark good for 57% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorite priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

The host has lost three consecutive games to conference foes.  

The host is avenging a same-season loss.  

The host is playing on the same or more rest.  

SMU vs Cal 
7-Unit bet on SMU priced as a 3.5-point favorite. 

Let’s start with a sports betting algorithm that has done extremely well in facing ugly looking underdogs over many seasons. The algorithm has produced a 603-197 (75%) SU record and a solid 458-329-13 ATS mark good for 58% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: 

Bet on road favorite priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

The host has lost three consecutive games to conference foes.  

The host is avenging a same-season loss.  

The host is playing on the same or more rest.  

If the favorite has won the last five meetings against this host, they have gone on to a 118-28 SU (81%) and 96-48-2 ATS mark good for 67% winning bets. If the favorite has won the last 6 meetings, they have gone 82-15 (84%) and 67-29-1 ATS for 70% winning bets. 

Clippers vs Bulls 
7-Unit bet on the Clippers priced as an 8.5-point favorite. 

The following NNBA betting algorithm has produced a 129-42 SU (75%) and a 99-71-1 ATS good for 58% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorites of 4.5 or more points.  

The game occurs in the second half of the season.  

The favorite has won more games but not more than 20% more games as measured by win percentage.  

The total is 225 or more points. 

Consider betting 75% preflop and then bet the money line when the in-game spread hits 2.5-points for the remaining 25% betting amount during the first half of action. 

76ers vs Knicks 
7-unit bet on the 76ers priced as 10.5-point dogs. 

This is certainly one of those bets where you must hold your nose shut given the horrific odor coming from our team, the 76ers. However, when the analytics support a truly ugly dog situation such as the one the 76ers find themselves in right now, they sometimes become money-makers. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 35-40 SU record and a 48-26-1 ATS record good for 65% winning bets since 2021. The requirements are:  

Bet on road teams that are coming off a horrid double-digit upset loss at home.  

They defeated the current opponent in their previous meeting and in the same season.  

They were favored by 3.5 or more points in their previous loss.  

If the game is a divisional matchup, these road teams have gone 20-6-1 ATS good for 77% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. 

Providence vs Marquette 
7-Unit bet on Providence priced as a 12.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball algorithm has produced an 11-76 SU and 51-36 ATS record good for 59% winning bets since 2015. The requires identifying an active betting opportunity are: 

Bet on double-digit road dogs. 

The dog is coming off an upset road loss by double-digits. 

If the opponent is ranked in the Top 25, they have gone 4-23 SU, but a highly profitable 20-7 ATS good for 74% winning bets.  

Lakers vs Nuggets 
7-Unit bet on the Lakers priced as 7-point underdogs. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has gone 133-207 SU and 199-138-3 ATS for 69% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on dogs priced between 3.5 and 7.5 points. 

The opponent is coming off three consecutive games scoring 120 or more points in each one. 

If our team is on the road, they have gone 76-122 SU and 120-77-3 ATS for 61% winning bets. Drilling further into the data we learn that if our team is facing a conference foe they have gone 57-72 SU and 85-42-2 ATS for 67% winning bets. 

Mississippi vs Vanderbilt 
7-Unit bet on Vanderbilt priced as a 1.5-point favorite. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced an 52-32 SU record and 52-29-3 ATS record good for 64% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are:  

Bet on home teams. 

The total is priced between 140 and 153 points. 

The home team has failed to cover the psread by 55 to 70 points over their previous 10 games. 

The opponent has seen the total play OVER by 35 or more points spanning their previous five games. 

Eastern Tennessee State vs Wofford. 
7-Unit bet on Wofford priced as 2.5-point favorites. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 36-15 SUATS record good for 71% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are:  

Bet on a team priced between the 3’s. 

That team is averaging 67 to 74 PPG. 

The opponent is also averaging 67 to 74 PPG. 

Our team led their previous game by 20 or more points at the half. 

The game is the 18th or more of the season. 

Spurs vs Pistons 
7-Unit bet on the Spurs priced as 4.5-point underdogs. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 133-206 record and 199-137-3 ATS record good 59% winning bets over the past six seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on underdogs priced between 3.5 and 7.5 points.  

Facing a team that scored 120 or more points in each of their last two games.  

If the foe is allowing 47% or worse shooting, then our team has gone on to a 38-32 SU and 44-25-1 ATS record good for 64% winning bets. If our dog is playing at home, they have a produced a highly profitable 20-18 SU (56%) and a 27-11 ATS record good for 71% winning bets that have covered the spread by an average of 6.9 PPG. 

Michigan State vs Michigan 
7-Unit bet on Michigan State priced as a 2.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting system has produced a 17-23 SU and 25-14-1 ASTS result good for 64% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: 

Bet on a team ranked between 10 and 25. 

They are facing a foe that is ranked but 2 or more places better in the polls. (MSU 14 vs Michigan 12). 

That foe is ranked between 10 and 25. 

Our team is priced between a 1 and 4-point road underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting system has produced a 15-16 SU and 22-9 ATS result good for 71% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: 

Bet on a road team with 20 or more wins. 

The opponent has won 20 or more games. 

The road team is playing with less days of rest. 

The total is priced between 150 and 155 points. 

Taking a bigger slice of the totals data and include games with a total between 150 and 160 points, has produced a 17-20 SU and 24-12-1 ATS record good for 67% winning bets. 

Knicks vs Cavs 
7-Unit bet on the Knicks priced as 8-point underdogs. 

The following betting algorithm has produced a 54-29 SU record and a 55-26-2 ATS mark for 68% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on a team that has lost to the spread by a total of 47 or more points over their last seven games.  

That team has won 60 to 75% of their games on the season.  

The guest has a winning record.  

If the foe is on a two or more-game win streak (Cleveland is on a 5-game win streak) these dogs have gone 23-11 SU and 26-7-1 ATS for 79% winning bets spanning the past six seasons. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 67-40 SU and a 68-38-1 ATS good for 64% winning bets over the past 6 seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on any team that has failed to cover the spread by 48 or more points over their last seven games.  

That team has won between 60 and 75% of their games.  

The opponent has a winning record.  

If our team is the underdog or priced at pick-em, they have gone 22-21 SU and 29-14 ATS for 67.4% winning bets over the past 7 seasons. 

Tonight, February 21, 2025, the New York Knicks (36-18) take on the Cleveland Cavaliers (44-10) at Rocket Mortgage FieldHouse in a marquee Eastern Conference showdown airing at 7:00 PM ET on ESPN, FDSOH, and MSG. With the Cavaliers sitting atop the conference and the Knicks riding a four-game road winning streak, this clash promises high stakes and intense competition. The Knicks, as underdogs, have a chance to pull off an upset on the road if they capitalize on their recent momentum and key matchups. Let’s break down the trends, star performances, and critical battles that could tilt the game in New York’s favor. 

Recent Team Trends (Past 10 Games) 

New York Knicks (8-2 in their last 10): The Knicks have been on a tear, particularly on the road, where they’ve won their last four contests. Their offensive firepower ranks fourth in the NBA at 118.4 points per game, while their defense, allowing 112.5 points per contest, sits 12th league-wide. Over the past 10 games, they’ve showcased resilience despite injury challenges, going 8-2 with a balanced attack and stout rebounding (43.0 per game, 23rd in the league). Notably, they’ve held opponents to just 41.2 rebounds per game—best in the NBA—thanks to their physical frontcourt and hustle. Their three-point shooting has been solid (12.8 makes per game, 19th in the league) with a 37.6% clip (fifth-best), a weapon that could exploit Cleveland’s perimeter defense. 

Cleveland Cavaliers (9-1 in their last 10): The Cavaliers have been a juggernaut, boasting a 44-10 record and a five-game winning streak. They’ve gone 9-1 over their last 10, with their only loss coming in a tight contest that exposed rare vulnerabilities. Cleveland thrives on elite three-point shooting (16.2 makes per game, second in the NBA; 39.3% accuracy, league-best) and a top-tier defense that’s suffocated opponents. Their rebounding (44.8 per game, 13th in the league) and ability to limit second-chance opportunities (43.4 rebounds allowed, 13th) make them a formidable foe. The Cavs’ recent dominance at home (25-4) suggests they’re nearly unbeatable at Rocket Mortgage FieldHouse, but their perimeter defense has shown cracks against sharpshooting teams. 

Star Player Statistics 

New York Knicks: 

Jalen Brunson (PG): Brunson has been the Knicks’ engine, averaging 27.8 points, 6.5 assists, and 3.8 rebounds per game this season, with a knack for clutch performances. In the last 10 games, he’s elevated his play, routinely dropping 30+ points and dissecting defenses with his crafty ball-handling and mid-range game. His 38.5% three-point shooting could punish Cleveland’s guards if left unchecked. 

Karl-Anthony Towns (C): Towns, acquired in the offseason, has been a revelation, posting 23.5 points and 11.8 rebounds per game. His ability to stretch the floor (41.2% from three) and dominate inside gives the Knicks a matchup nightmare. Over the past 10 games, he’s averaged a double-double, exploiting slower bigs with his versatility. 

Mikal Bridges (SF): Bridges brings elite two-way play, averaging 19.2 points and 2.1 steals per game. His defensive tenacity and 39.0% three-point shooting have been pivotal in recent wins, making him a critical X-factor. 

Cleveland Cavaliers: 

Donovan Mitchell (SG): Mitchell remains Cleveland’s superstar, averaging 23.9 points, 4.8 assists, and 4.4 rebounds per game, with a lethal 39.1% from three (3.6 makes per game, fifth in the NBA). In the last 10 games, he’s been scorching, often exceeding 25 points and torching defenses with his explosive drives and pull-up jumpers. 

Darius Garland (PG): Garland complements Mitchell with 21.6 points and 6.7 assists per game, shooting 45.8% from the field. His playmaking has fueled Cleveland’s recent surge, averaging over 7 assists in the last 10 games while hitting timely threes (38.4%). 

Evan Mobley (PF): Mobley anchors the frontcourt with 18.5 points, 9.1 rebounds, and 1.8 blocks per game. His defensive presence and improved mid-range game (49.5% shooting) have been key, with double-doubles piling up over the past 10 contests. 

Jarrett Allen (C): Allen’s steady production—13.6 points, 10.3 rebounds, and 1.0 block per game—bolsters Cleveland’s interior. He’s been a rebounding machine lately, grabbing 12+ boards in several of the last 10 games. 

Key Matchups for a Knicks Upset 

Jalen Brunson vs. Darius Garland: 

Why It Matters: Brunson’s ability to outduel Garland could dictate the game’s tempo. Garland’s playmaking is elite, but Brunson’s physicality and scoring prowess give him an edge in one-on-one situations. If Brunson exploits Garland’s average defense (1.1 steals but often targeted), he could control the paint and open up New York’s shooters. 

Knicks’ Edge: Brunson’s recent form—scoring efficiently in the clutch—could overwhelm Garland, especially if Cleveland doubles Towns, leaving Brunson with space to operate. 

Karl-Anthony Towns vs. Evan Mobley/Jarrett Allen: 

Why It Matters: Towns’ versatility poses a unique challenge for Cleveland’s twin towers. Mobley and Allen excel at rim protection, but Towns can pull them out to the perimeter with his three-point shooting. If he spaces the floor, it opens driving lanes for Brunson and Bridges. 

Knicks’ Edge: Towns has the quickness to blow by Allen and the shooting touch to punish Mobley’s drop coverage. A hot night from deep could force Cleveland to adjust, weakening their interior defense. 

Mikal Bridges vs. Donovan Mitchell: 

Why It Matters: Bridges is New York’s best bet to slow Mitchell, who’s torched lesser defenders all season. If Bridges can disrupt Mitchell’s rhythm—using his 6’6” frame and active hands—the Cavs’ offense might stall, giving the Knicks a chance to keep pace. 

Knicks’ Edge: Bridges’ defensive IQ and stamina could wear Mitchell down, especially late in the game. Offensively, Bridges’ catch-and-shoot ability might exploit Cleveland’s 25th-ranked three-point defense (per early-season metrics). 

Knicks’ Bench vs. Cavaliers’ Depth: 

Why It Matters: Injuries have depleted New York’s roster, but players like Miles McBride and Precious Achiuwa have stepped up. Cleveland’s bench, led by Sam Merrill (43.2% from three), provides scoring punch. The Knicks need their reserves to match Cleveland’s energy. 

Knicks’ Edge: If Achiuwa dominates the glass and McBride hits open shots, New York could steal crucial minutes while starters rest. 

Path to a Knicks Upset Road Win 

For the Knicks to shock the Cavaliers in Cleveland, they must lean on their strengths and exploit Cleveland’s few weaknesses: 

Three-Point Barrage: Cleveland’s perimeter defense has faltered against sharpshooting teams (e.g., 25th in early-season three-point defense metrics). If Brunson, Towns, and Bridges combine for 8+ threes, the Knicks can stretch Cleveland thin. 

Rebounding Edge: Despite ranking 23rd in rebounds per game, New York’s league-best 41.2 rebounds allowed shows their tenacity. Winning the glass against Mobley and Allen—limiting second-chance points—keeps the game close. 

Force Turnovers: The Knicks’ active defense (led by Bridges’ steals) must disrupt Cleveland’s crisp ball movement (24.8 assists per game, sixth in the NBA). Forcing 15+ turnovers could flip the script. 

Brunson’s Heroics: In a tight fourth quarter, Brunson’s clutch gene—evident in his 51.6% field goal percentage in clutch minutes this season—could seal an upset. 

Prediction 

The Cavaliers are rightfully favored with their 44-10 record and home dominance, but the Knicks’ recent road success (17-8) and offensive firepower make this closer than expected. Cleveland’s three-point barrage and interior defense give them an edge, yet New York’s stars have the tools to hang tough. If Towns exploits the mismatch and Bridges contains Mitchell, the Knicks could steal a 115-112 victory in a nail-biter. Expect a high-energy, playoff-like atmosphere as the Knicks aim to prove they belong among the East’s elite. 

Cal State Northridge vs UC Irvine 
7-unit bet on Cal State Northridge priced as a 6.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball algorithm has produced a 14-13 SU (52%) and 21-5-1 ATS record good for 81% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on an underdog priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. 

That dog is coming off an upset win priced as a double-digit underdog. 

The favorite is coming off a road win over a conference rival. 

Clippers vs Bucks 
7-Unit bet on the Clippers priced as 2.5-point road favorites. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has been used to produce a 25-14 SU and 24-14-1 ATS record for 63% winning bets since 2019. The requirements needed are: 

Bet on road teams that are shooting 47% or better for the season. 

They are coming off two games in which they shot 50% or better in each one. 

They are facing a foe that shoots 47% or better for the season. 

The game occurs after the all-star break. 

The road team is priced between the 3’s. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has been used to produce a 78-24 SU and 66-35-1 ATS record for 65.3% winning bets since 2018. The requirements needed are: 

Bet on road favorites. 

They defeated the host in the previous meeting by double-digits. 

The host is coming off an upset road win. 

Cavs vs Nets 
7-Unit bet on the Nets priced as 12/5-point home underdogs. 

Betting on teams that have allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games and now facing a foe that scored 120 or more points in their previous game have gone 132-103 SU (56%) and 134-97-4 ATS for 58% winning bets over the past five seasons.  

Now, if our team is playing at home, then the five-season record went 84-35 SU and 78-38-5 ATS (67.2%).  

Austin Peay vs Royals 
7-Unit bet on Austin Peay priced as a 6.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball algorithm has produced a 36-63 SU (36%) and 62-37 ATS record good for 63% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on road underdogs including pick-em. 

The road teamhas committed 11 or fewer turnovers in each of their last four games. 

The opponent is coming off a double-digit win in which they committed 8 or fewer turnovers. 

Hornets vs Lakers 
7-Unit bet on the Hornets priced as 12-point underdogs. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 8=17 SU (32%) and 19-6 ATS good for 76% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are:  

Bet on road underdogs.  

The game occurs in the second half of the regular season.  

Our dog has seen the total play Under by 58 or more points over their last 10 games.  

The opponent has covered the spread by 75 or more points over their previous 10 games.  

If a conference road dog, our team has gone 14-4 ATS for 78% winning bets. 

Tonight's NBA showdown between the Charlotte Hornets and the Los Angeles Lakers is set to be an exciting contest. The game will tip off at 10:00 p.m. ET at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, California. 

Key Matchups to Watch 

LaMelo Ball vs. Luka Doncic 

LaMelo Ball: The Hornets' star guard is averaging 27.3 points, 7.2 assists, and 5.1 rebounds per game. His playmaking and scoring ability will be crucial for Charlotte. 

Luka Doncic: The Lakers' newly acquired guard is averaging 27.0 points, 8.0 rebounds, and 7.5 assists per game. Doncic's versatility and scoring prowess will be key for the Lakers. 

Miles Bridges vs. LeBron James 

Miles Bridges: The Hornets' forward is averaging 19.5 points and 7.7 rebounds per game. His ability to score and rebound will be vital for Charlotte. 

LeBron James: The Lakers' superstar is averaging 24.3 points, 7.7 rebounds, and 9.0 assists per game. James' leadership and all-around game will be crucial for the Lakers. 

Rebounding Battle 

Charlotte's Rebounding: The Hornets average 45.7 rebounds per game, led by Bridges. Winning the rebounding battle will be crucial for Charlotte to limit the Lakers' second-chance opportunities. 

Los Angeles' Rebounding: The Lakers average 41.9 rebounds per game, with James leading the team. Controlling the glass will be key for the Lakers to limit Charlotte's scoring opportunities. 

Three-Point Shooting 

Charlotte's Three-Point Shooting: The Hornets shoot 43.0% from the field. Their ability to hit three-pointers will be essential against the Lakers' defense. 

Los Angeles' Perimeter Defense: The Lakers' opponents shoot 46.7% from the field. The Lakers will need to improve their perimeter defense to limit Charlotte's scoring opportunities. 

Latest Injury Report and Player Status 

Charlotte Hornets: 

LaMelo Ball: Probable with right ankle soreness. 

Mark Williams: Probable due to "return to competition conditioning". 

Brandon Miller: Out for the season (wrist). 

Grant Williams: Out for the season (ACL). 

Josh Okogie: Out (hamstring). 

Tre Mann: Out for the season (back). 

Moussa Diabate: Day-to-day (eye). 

Los Angeles Lakers: 

LeBron James: Questionable with left foot soreness. 

Cameron Reddish: Day-to-day (personal). 

Dorian Finney-Smith: Day-to-day (ankle). 

Gabe Vincent: Day-to-day (knee). 

Maximilian Kleber: Out (foot). 

Charlotte's Path to Victory 

For the Charlotte Hornets to secure a huge road win, they need to focus on the following: 

Defensive Intensity: Apply relentless ball pressure and force turnovers to disrupt the Lakers' offensive rhythm. 

Control the Tempo: Slow down the game to prevent the Lakers from capitalizing on their fast-paced style. 

Rebounding: Dominate the boards, especially against James, to limit second-chance opportunities for the Lakers. 

Efficient Scoring: Take advantage of the Lakers' defensive vulnerabilities, particularly in transition and from beyond the arc. 

From the Predictive Models: My models show and expect that the Hornets will score 111 or more points and have the same or fewer turnovers. Over the past 10 season, the Hornets are 65-47 SU and 76-34-2 ASTS for 69% winning bets when they have scored 111 or more points and had the same or fewer turnovers. The Lakers are 38-73 SU and 28-81-2 ATS good for 26% winners when allowing 111 or more points and having the same or more turnovers in home games since 2015. 

North Dakota State vs South Dakota State 
7-Unit bet on NDST priced as a 6.5-pointdog. 

The following NCAA basketball betting algorithm has produced an exceptional 87-54-3ATS record for 62% winning bets since 2015. The requirements for this bet are:  

Bet on a team that is coming off a win over a conference foe priced as a double-digit underdog. 

That team is avenging a same-season loss. 

If the total is priced between 150 and 160 points, our team has gone 15-6-1 ATS good for 71.4% winning bets. 

Tonight's Summit League showdown between the North Dakota State Bison and the South Dakota State Jackrabbits is set to be an exciting contest. The game will tip off at 8 p.m. ET at First Bank and Trust Arena in Brookings, South Dakota. 

Key Matchups to Watch 

Jacksen Moni vs. Oscar Cluff 

Jacksen Moni: North Dakota State's forward, averaging 20.6 points per game, is the Bison's top scorer. His ability to score inside and outside will be crucial for North Dakota State. 

Oscar Cluff: South Dakota State's center, averaging 17.4 points and 12.7 rebounds per game, is a dominant force in the paint. Cluff's rebounding and shot-blocking abilities will be key to limiting Moni's impact. 

North Dakota State's Offense vs. South Dakota State's Defense 

North Dakota State's Offense: The Bison average 81.3 points per game, with a balanced scoring attack led by Moni and Jacari White. Their ability to score efficiently will be crucial against South Dakota State's defense. 

South Dakota State's Defense: The Jackrabbits allow 73.3 points per game and are known for their ability to force turnovers. Their defensive intensity will be key to slowing down North Dakota State's high-powered offense. 

Rebounding Battle 

North Dakota State's Rebounding: The Bison average 30.5 rebounds per game, with Noah Feddersen leading the team with 6.0 rebounds per game. Winning the rebounding battle will be crucial for North Dakota State to limit South Dakota State's second-chance opportunities. 

South Dakota State's Rebounding: The Jackrabbits average 35.5 rebounds per game, with Cluff being a dominant force on the boards. Controlling the glass will be key for South Dakota State to limit North Dakota State's scoring opportunities. 

Three-Point Shooting 

North Dakota State's Three-Point Shooting: The Bison shoot 47.5% from the field, with a strong emphasis on three-point shooting. Their ability to hit three-pointers will be essential against South Dakota State's defense. 

South Dakota State's Perimeter Defense: The Jackrabbits' opponents shoot 42.1% from the field. South Dakota State will need to improve their perimeter defense to limit North Dakota State's scoring opportunities. 

North Dakota State's Path to Victory 

For North Dakota State to secure a huge upset road win, they need to focus on the following: 

Defensive Intensity: Apply relentless ball pressure and force turnovers to disrupt South Dakota State's offensive rhythm. 

Control the Tempo: Slow down the game to prevent South Dakota State from capitalizing on their fast-paced style. 

Rebounding: Dominate the boards, especially against Cluff, to limit second-chance opportunities for the Jackrabbits. 

Efficient Scoring: Take advantage of South Dakota State's defensive vulnerabilities, particularly in transition and from beyond the arc. 

Gardner Webb vs Longwood 
7-Unit bet on Gardner Web priced as a 3.5-point underdog. 

Let’s start with a sports betting algorithm that has done extremely well in facing ugly looking underdogs over many seasons. The algorithm has produced a 633-199 SU (76%) record and a solid 479-340-13 ATS mark good for 59% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorite priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

The host has lost three consecutive games to conference foes.  

The host is avenging a same-season loss.  

The host is playing on the same or more rest.  

onight's Big South Conference showdown between the Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs and the Longwood Lancers is set to be an exciting contest. The game will tip off at 7 p.m. ET at the Joan Perry Brock Center in Farmville, Virginia. 

Key Matchups to Watch 

Darryl Simmons II vs. Michael Christmas 

Darryl Simmons II: Gardner-Webb's guard, averaging 17.7 points per game, is the Runnin' Bulldogs' top scorer. His ability to score and distribute the ball will be crucial for Gardner-Webb. 

Michael Christmas: Longwood's forward, averaging 12.0 points per game, is a key player for the Lancers. Christmas' scoring and rebounding abilities will be vital for Longwood. 

Gardner-Webb's Offense vs. Longwood's Defense 

Gardner-Webb's Offense: The Runnin' Bulldogs average 75.3 points per game, with a balanced scoring attack led by Simmons and Jamaine Mann. Their ability to score efficiently will be crucial against Longwood's defense2. 

Longwood's Defense: The Lancers allow 72.9 points per game and are known for their ability to force turnovers. Their defensive intensity will be key to slowing down Gardner-Webb's high-powered offense2. 

Rebounding Battle 

Gardner-Webb's Rebounding: The Runnin' Bulldogs average 33.7 rebounds per game, with Mann leading the team with 5.0 rebounds per game. Winning the rebounding battle will be crucial for Gardner-Webb to limit Longwood's second-chance opportunities3. 

Longwood's Rebounding: The Lancers average 29.9 rebounds per game, with Christmas being a dominant force on the boards. Controlling the glass will be key for Longwood to limit Gardner-Webb's scoring opportunities3. 

Three-Point Shooting 

Gardner-Webb's Three-Point Shooting: The Runnin' Bulldogs shoot 34.2% from beyond the arc. Their ability to hit three-pointers will be essential against Longwood's defense2. 

Longwood's Perimeter Defense: The Lancers' opponents shoot 31.9% from three-point range. Longwood will need to improve their perimeter defense to limit Gardner-Webb's scoring opportunities2. 

Gardner-Webb's Path to Victory 

For Gardner-Webb to secure a huge road win, they need to focus on the following: 

Defensive Intensity: Apply relentless ball pressure and force turnovers to disrupt Longwood's offensive rhythm. 

Control the Tempo: Slow down the game to prevent Longwood from capitalizing on their fast-paced style. 

Rebounding: Dominate the boards, especially against Christmas, to limit second-chance opportunities for the Lancers. 

Efficient Scoring: Take advantage of Longwood's defensive vulnerabilities, particularly in transition and from beyond the arc. 

Central Michigan vs Ohio 

7-Unit bet on Central Michigan priced as a 5.5-point road underdog. 

Date: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 
Time: 7:00 PM EST (assumed standard tip-off time) 
Location: Convocation Center, Athens, OH 
Current Date Context: Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 10:17 AM EST  

Overview 

Tonight, the Central Michigan Chippewas head to Athens to take on the Ohio Bobcats in a Mid-American Conference (MAC) clash at the Convocation Center. Central Michigan, coming off a 76-59 home loss to Ohio on January 21, 2025, seeks to reverse their fortunes and pull off an upset against a Bobcats squad that has won four straight against them, including that earlier meeting this season. Ohio, sitting at 8-8 overall and 3-3 in MAC play, aims to leverage their 6-2 home record to solidify their standing, while Central Michigan (7-9, 2-4 MAC) looks to snap a two-game skid. With both teams battling for mid-tier positioning in the MAC, this game could hinge on key individual performances and defensive execution. 

Key Matchups for a Central Michigan Upset 

Anthony Pritchard vs. Aidan Hadaway  

Why It Matters: Pritchard, Central Michigan’s senior guard, leads with 14.5 PPG and 5.1 APG, excelling in transition (1.7 SPG). Hadaway, Ohio’s sophomore forward, averages 12.8 PPG and is a key scorer in the paint (54.0% FG). Pritchard’s ability to disrupt Ohio’s half-court sets with steals and push the pace could exploit Hadaway’s 2.1 turnovers per game.  

Upset Factor: If Pritchard outduels Hadaway, forcing turnovers (Ohio averages 14.2 forced turnovers) and converting them into fast-break points, Central Michigan can keep Ohio’s offense off balance. 

Ugnius Jarusevicius vs. AJ Clayton  

Why It Matters:Jarusevicius, a junior forward, brings 11.2 PPG and 6.2 RPG, thriving on second-chance opportunities (2.0 offensive RPG). Clayton, Ohio’s junior forward, counters with 11.5 PPG and 5.8 RPG, anchoring the Bobcats’ frontcourt with 1.8 BPG. Jarusevicius’ rebounding edge could neutralize Clayton’s rim protection.  

Upset Factor: If Jarusevicius outrebounds Clayton (Ohio ranks 289th in opponent PPG at 75.5), Central Michigan can dominate the glass (they’re 38.2 RPG vs. Ohio’s 35.2) and score crucial putbacks. 

Damarion Bonds vs. AJ Brown  

Why It Matters: Bonds, a sophomore guard off the bench, has surged to 12.0 PPG, hitting 38.0% from three. Brown, Ohio’s senior guard, leads with 13.6 PPG and 40.5% 3PT, thriving in clutch moments. Bonds’ recent form (22 points vs. Purdue Northwest) could match Brown’s perimeter threat.  

Upset Factor: If Bonds limits Brown’s 3-point looks (Ohio’s 41.6% opponent 3PT defense is shaky) and heats up from deep, Central Michigan can stretch Ohio’s defense thin. 

Recent Results 

Central Michigan (7-9, 2-4 MAC): After a 91-83 road loss to Kent State on February 11 and a 76-59 home defeat to Ohio on January 21, the Chippewas are 2-6 on the road but 8-8 ATS overall.  

Ohio (8-8, 3-3 MAC): The Bobcats beat Toledo 85-79 at home on February 15, improving to 5-5 in their last 10, with a 6-2 home record and 8-9 ATS mark. 

Path to a Central Michigan Upset 

Central Michigan can upset Ohio by exploiting their defensive weaknesses (289th in opponent PPG at 75.5) and capitalizing on turnovers (Ohio forces 14.2 per game but commits 12.5). Pritchard’s pressure on Hadaway, Jarusevicius’ rebounding edge over Clayton, and Bonds’ hot shooting against Brown are critical. Ohio’s 41.6% opponent 3-point defense could falter if Central Michigan (32.5% 3PT team average) gets hot from deep. The Chippewas must also minimize fouls (Ohio draws 18.0 per game) and dominate the glass (38.2 RPG vs. Ohio’s 35.2) to secure extra possessions. 

From My Predictive Models 

Ohio’s home advantage and balanced attack give them an edge, but Central Michigan’s desperation and Bonds’ spark keep it close. Ohio 73, Central Michigan 68 – take Central Michigan +6.5 and lean Under 142.5 if Miles Brown sits. 

The model projects that CMU will shoot 43% or better from the field. In past road games priced as a dog of not more than 9.5 points. They have produced an exceptional 15-11 SU and 17-8-1 ATS record good for 68% winning bets. 

NCAA Basketball Game Preview: Villanova Wildcats vs. UConn Huskies 
7-Unit bet on Villanova priced as an 8.5=point underdog. 
Alternative bet: 6-Units on line and 2-Units on the money line. 

Date: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 
Time: 6:30 PM EST 
Location: XL Center, Hartford, CT 
Current Date Context: Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 07:45 AM EST  

Overview 

Tonight, the Villanova Wildcats travel to the XL Center in Hartford to face the No. 9 UConn Huskies in a crucial Big East clash at 6:30 PM EST. This marks the second meeting of the 2024-25 season between these rivals, following Villanova’s dramatic 68-66 upset over UConn on January 8, 2025, at Finneran Pavilion. The Wildcats, buoyed by an 8-1 home record but untested in hostile environments lately, seek another signature win against the two-time defending national champions. UConn, with a 14-3 overall record and 6-1 in Big East play, looks to defend their 7-0 home mark and exact revenge. With both teams jostling for conference supremacy, this game promises intensity and stakes aplenty. 

Betting Lines and Totals 

Spread: UConn -8 (-110) | Villanova +8 (-110)  
Moneyline: UConn -375 | Villanova +300  
Over/Under Total: 143.5 (-108)  
Team Totals: UConn 75.5 | Villanova 68 

Analysis: UConn opens as an 8-point favorite, per posts on X from February 17, reflecting their dominance at the XL Center and motivation after the January loss. Villanova’s +8 spread aligns with their underdog status as a road team facing a top 10 foe, a scenario where they haven’t won since a 68-66 overtime upset at Creighton in December 2023. The 143.5 total suggests a moderately high-scoring game, with UConn’s 75.5 team total banking on their offensive firepower and Villanova’s 68 hinting at a defensive battle to keep it close. Bettors might eye Villanova +8 given their history of competitiveness in this rivalry. 

Key Matchups for a Villanova Upset 

Eric Dixon vs. Alex Karaban  

Why It Matters: Dixon’s 23-point outburst in the January win, including 9-of-9 free throws and 3-of-5 from three, exposed Karaban’s defensive limitations. Karaban, averaging 1.9 blocks, struggled with just 10 points and missed key free throws late. Dixon’s ability to stretch the floor (49.5% 3PT) could pull Karaban out of the paint, opening lanes for Villanova’s guards.  

Upset Factor: If Dixon scores 20+ again and draws fouls on Karaban (2.1 per game), UConn’s frontcourt depth thins, especially with Liam McNeeley doubtful (see injury report). 

Wooga Poplar vs. Solo Ball  

Why It Matters: Poplar’s 14 points and 8 rebounds, capped by a clutch 3-pointer, sealed the January victory. Ball answered with 16 points (4-of-6 from three), but Villanova’s defense tightened late. Poplar’s 7.1 RPG as a guard can neutralize UConn’s transition game, while Ball’s 45.0% 3-point shooting tests Villanova’s perimeter D.  

Upset Factor: Poplar limiting Ball to under 40% from deep (UConn shot 37.5% last time) and crashing the boards could stifle UConn’s rhythm and give Villanova extra possessions. 

Jhamir Brickus vs. Hassan Diarra  

Why It Matters: Brickus ran a turnover-free offense in January (6 assists), outplaying Diarra, who scored 8 points on 3-of-8 shooting. Diarra’s 1.5 steals and 6.6 assists fuel UConn’s fast break, but Brickus’ 5.9 APG and Villanova’s Big East-leading 10.3 turnovers per game keep them composed.  

Upset Factor: If Brickus forces Diarra into turnovers (UConn’s 18.9% rate in Big East play) and feeds Dixon and Poplar efficiently, Villanova controls tempo and exploits mismatches. 

Player Injury Reports and Status (Hypothetical as of February 18, 2025) 

Villanova:  

Enoch Boakye (F, Jr.): Doubtful – Ankle sprain (out since February 15 vs. Providence). His 4.7 PPG and 6.7 RPG absence hurts Villanova’s rebounding.  

Eric Dixon: Probable – Knee soreness (full practice February 17, no missed games). 

UConn:  

Liam McNeeley (F, Fr.): Doubtful – Right foot injury (re-aggravated February 11 vs. Creighton, limited to 8 minutes vs. St. John’s February 15). His 13.6 PPG and 5.8 RPG are critical losses.  

Tarris Reed Jr.: Probable – Back stiffness (full practice February 17, expected to start). 

Recent Results 

Villanova (11-6, 4-2 Big East): Since upsetting UConn on January 8 and crushing DePaul 100-56, the Wildcats lost 86-79 at Creighton on February 15. They’re 1-4 on the road in Big East play but 1-0 vs. ranked teams away.  

UConn (14-3, 6-1 Big East): The Huskies have won 10 of their last 11, including an 87-84 thriller over Providence on January 5, but fell 68-62 to St. John’s at home on February 15, their first loss since Villanova. 

Path to a Villanova Upset 

Villanova can stun UConn by leaning on their January blueprint: forcing turnovers (13 last time), shooting lights-out from the line (92.3%), and neutralizing UConn’s 3-point game (37.5% allowed). Dixon exploiting Karaban’s defense, Poplar outrebounding Ball, and Brickus outsmarting Diarra are musts. UConn’s rebounding edge (top-50 nationally) and home crowd loom large, but Villanova’s 45% 3-point attempt rate and road upset pedigree (Creighton 2023) could crack the Huskies’ armor, especially if McNeeley sits. 

My Prediction Models 

From my predictive mode we are expecting Villanova to make 47% or more of their shots and have the better and more efficient assist-turnover ratio. In past games since 2015, Villanova is 91-6 SU and 76-19-2 ASTS for 80% in games played in which they shot 46% or better from the field and had the better assist-to-turnover ratio; when priced as the dog they have gone 25-4 SU and 23-5-1 ATS for 82% winning bets. Villanova is 7-4 SU and 8-2-1 ATS for 80% winning bets facing a foe that they previously defeated at home in the same season.  

UConn’s home dominance and revenge motive make them tough, but Villanova’s resilience and confidence knowing they won the previous meeting keeps it tight. Dixon’s scoring and a late Poplar triple steal it. Villanova 71, UConn 70 – grab Villanova +8 and lean Under 143.5 with Boakye out. 

Central Michigan vs Ohio 
7-Unit bet on Central Michigan priced as a 5.5-point road underdog. 

Date: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 
Time: 7:00 PM EST (assumed standard tip-off time) 
Location: Convocation Center, Athens, OH 
Current Date Context: Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 10:17 AM EST  

Overview 

Tonight, the Central Michigan Chippewas head to Athens to take on the Ohio Bobcats in a Mid-American Conference (MAC) clash at the Convocation Center. Central Michigan, coming off a 76-59 home loss to Ohio on January 21, 2025, seeks to reverse their fortunes and pull off an upset against a Bobcats squad that has won four straight against them, including that earlier meeting this season. Ohio, sitting at 8-8 overall and 3-3 in MAC play, aims to leverage their 6-2 home record to solidify their standing, while Central Michigan (7-9, 2-4 MAC) looks to snap a two-game skid. With both teams battling for mid-tier positioning in the MAC, this game could hinge on key individual performances and defensive execution. 

Betting Lines and Totals (Hypothetical as of February 18, 2025) 

Spread: Ohio -6.5 (-110) | Central Michigan +6.5 (-110)  

Moneyline: Ohio -275 | Central Michigan +225  

Over/Under Total: 142.5 (-108)  

Team Totals: Ohio 74.5 | Central Michigan 68 

Key Matchups for a Central Michigan Upset 

Anthony Pritchard vs. Aidan Hadaway  

Why It Matters: Pritchard, Central Michigan’s senior guard, leads with 14.5 PPG and 5.1 APG, excelling in transition (1.7 SPG). Hadaway, Ohio’s sophomore forward, averages 12.8 PPG and is a key scorer in the paint (54.0% FG). Pritchard’s ability to disrupt Ohio’s half-court sets with steals and push the pace could exploit Hadaway’s 2.1 turnovers per game.  

Upset Factor: If Pritchard outduels Hadaway, forcing turnovers (Ohio averages 14.2 forced turnovers) and converting them into fast-break points, Central Michigan can keep Ohio’s offense off balance. 

Ugnius Jarusevicius vs. AJ Clayton  

Why It Matters:Jarusevicius, a junior forward, brings 11.2 PPG and 6.2 RPG, thriving on second-chance opportunities (2.0 offensive RPG). Clayton, Ohio’s junior forward, counters with 11.5 PPG and 5.8 RPG, anchoring the Bobcats’ frontcourt with 1.8 BPG. Jarusevicius’ rebounding edge could neutralize Clayton’s rim protection.  

Upset Factor: If Jarusevicius outrebounds Clayton (Ohio ranks 289th in opponent PPG at 75.5), Central Michigan can dominate the glass (they’re 38.2 RPG vs. Ohio’s 35.2) and score crucial putbacks. 

Damarion Bonds vs. AJ Brown  

Why It Matters: Bonds, a sophomore guard off the bench, has surged to 12.0 PPG, hitting 38.0% from three. Brown, Ohio’s senior guard, leads with 13.6 PPG and 40.5% 3PT, thriving in clutch moments. Bonds’ recent form (22 points vs. Purdue Northwest) could match Brown’s perimeter threat.  

Upset Factor: If Bonds limits Brown’s 3-point looks (Ohio’s 41.6% opponent 3PT defense is shaky) and heats up from deep, Central Michigan can stretch Ohio’s defense thin. 

Recent Results 

Central Michigan (7-9, 2-4 MAC): After a 91-83 road loss to Kent State on February 11 and a 76-59 home defeat to Ohio on January 21, the Chippewas are 2-6 on the road but 8-8 ATS overall.  

Ohio (8-8, 3-3 MAC): The Bobcats beat Toledo 85-79 at home on February 15, improving to 5-5 in their last 10, with a 6-2 home record and 8-9 ATS mark. 

Path to a Central Michigan Upset 

Central Michigan can upset Ohio by exploiting their defensive weaknesses (289th in opponent PPG at 75.5) and capitalizing on turnovers (Ohio forces 14.2 per game but commits 12.5). Pritchard’s pressure on Hadaway, Jarusevicius’ rebounding edge over Clayton, and Bonds’ hot shooting against Brown are critical. Ohio’s 41.6% opponent 3-point defense could falter if Central Michigan (32.5% 3PT team average) gets hot from deep. The Chippewas must also minimize fouls (Ohio draws 18.0 per game) and dominate the glass (38.2 RPG vs. Ohio’s 35.2) to secure extra possessions. 

From My Predictive Models 

Ohio’s home advantage and balanced attack give them an edge, but Central Michigan’s desperation and Bonds’ spark keep it close. Ohio 73, Central Michigan 68 – take Central Michigan +6.5 and lean Under 142.5 if Miles Brown sits. 

The model projects that CMU will shoot 43% or better from the field. In past road games priced as a dog of not more than 9.5 points. They have produced an exceptional 15-11 SU and 17-8-1 ATS record good for 68% winning bets. 

Bowling Green vs Kent State 
5-Unit bet on BGU priced as a 6.5-point underdog. 
Date: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 
Time: 7:00 PM EST 
Location: Stroh Center, Bowling Green, OH 
Current Date Context: Tuesday, February 18, 2025, 10:51 AM EST 

The following betting algorithm has produced a highly profitable 12-35 SU and 30-16-1 ATS good for 65% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on underdogs that are scoring between 74 and 79 PPG. 

They are facing a solid defensive team allowing an average of 63 to 67 PPG. 

The foe has scored 40 or more points in the first half of each of their two previous games. 

If the game is a conference matchup, these dogs have soared to a 7-13 SU and 16-3-1 ATS record for 84% winning bets since 2019.  

Overview 

Tonight, the Bowling Green Falcons welcome the Kent State Golden Flashes to the Stroh Center for a Mid-American Conference showdown at 7:00 PM EST. This marks the second meeting of the 2024-25 season between these rivals, following Kent State’s 75-57 home victory over Bowling Green on January 28, 2025. The Falcons (7-12, 2-6 MAC) aim to snap a three-game losing streak and capitalize on their 5-3 home record, while the Golden Flashes (12-7, 5-3 MAC) look to extend their dominance in this series, having won 10 straight against Bowling Green since January 2020. With a “Star Wars Night” theme and a halftime show by the BG Sabers, per posts on X from @BGSUMBB, the atmosphere promises to be electric as both teams vie for critical MAC positioning. 

Key Matchups for a Bowling Green Upset 

Marcus Johnson vs. Jalen Sullinger 

Why It Matters:Johnson, Bowling Green’s senior forward, leads the MAC with 16.1 PPG but managed just 21 points on 8-of-17 shooting in the January loss to Kent State. Sullinger, Kent State’s junior guard, torched the Falcons for 22 points in that game, hitting 5-of-8 from three. Johnson’s downhill drives test Sullinger’s 1.2 SPG.  

Upset Factor:If Johnson exploits Sullinger’s 2.0 fouls per game and scores 20+, while limiting his 3-point looks (Kent State shot 41.7% from deep last meeting), Bowling Green can flip the script. 

Trey Thomas vs. Marquis Barnett 

Why It Matters: Thomas, a senior guard, averages 11.8 PPG and 37.5% from three, forming a potent duo with Johnson. Barnett, Kent State’s junior guard, brings 13.8 PPG and 1.8 SPG, anchoring a defense that held Bowling Green to 57 points in January. Thomas’ perimeter game challenges Barnett’s quickness.  

Upset Factor:If Thomas heats up from deep (Bowling Green’s 8.1 3PM allowed vs. Kent State’s 6.7 made) and forces Barnett into turnovers (1.9 per game), the Falcons can stretch Kent State’s D. 

Anthony McComb III vs. Cli’Ron Hornbeak 

Why It Matters:McComb, a freshman guard, has emerged with 10.5 PPG off the bench, adding spark to Bowling Green’s attack. Hornbeak, Kent State’s senior forward, averages 11.0 PPG and 6.5 RPG, dominating inside with a double-double (12 points, 10 rebounds) in the last matchup.  

Upset Factor:If McComb outscores Hornbeak and Bowling Green crashes the glass (33.2 RPG vs. Kent State’s 34.1), they can neutralize Kent State’s interior edge. 

Recent Results 

Bowling Green (7-12, 2-6 MAC): The Falcons have lost three straight, including an 84-71 defeat at Toledo on January 24 and a 75-57 blowout to Kent State on January 28. They’re 5-3 at home but 2-6 ATS in their last eight.  

Kent State (12-7, 5-3 MAC): The Golden Flashes beat Ohio 61-59 on February 15 but lost 67-55 at Akron earlier, sporting a 3-3 road record and an 8-6 ATS mark. 

Path to a Bowling Green Upset 

Bowling Green can upset Kent State by leveraging their home crowd and pushing the tempo (53rd in adjusted tempo). Johnson and Thomas must outscore Sullinger and Barnett from the perimeter, where Kent State allows 41.6% shooting. Controlling the glass (33.2 RPG vs. Kent State’s 34.1) and forcing turnovers (Kent State’s 12.5 per game) are key, especially with Hornbeak’s paint presence looming. Kent State’s 10-game streak and defensive prowess (45th in PPG allowed at 64.1) are daunting, but Bowling Green’s 5.3-point scoring edge at home (75.3 PPG) could spark a breakthrough. 

Remember you can always bet in game, and I prefer that strategy for only during the first half of action. So, consider betting 3.5 units pre flop and then look to get 1.5 more units in BGU priced at 9.5 or more points. 

Syracuse vs Pittsburgh 
7-Unit bet OVER the posted total of 146.5 points. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 64-37-1 OVER record good for 64% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are: 

Bet over with a total priced between 140 and 149.5 points. 

The home team has played UNDER by 18 or more points over their previous three games. 

The home team has won 60 to 80% of their games. 

The road team has won 40 to 49% of their games. 

 
Florida vs Oklahoma 
7-Unit bet on the OVER currently priced at . 
The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 57-26-2 OVER record good for 69% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are: 

Bet on home favorites. 

They have won 15 or more of their previous 20 games. 

They have won 80% or more of their games. 

The total is priced between 150 and 160 points. 

The opponent has a winning record. 

Duke vs UVA 

10-Unit bet on UVA priced as a 14.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA basketball algorithm has produced a 33-96 SU (25%) and 90-37-2 ATS record good for 71% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: 

Bet on underdogs that is scoring between 62 and 67 PPG. 

The game is at least the 16th one of the seasons. 

The favorite is coming off a game in which 175 or more points were scored. 

The favorite is averaging 78 or more PPG. 

This algorithm has had just one unprofitable season and that was in 2018 when the system produced a 1-3 ATS record. This algorithm has produced three seasons in which it had nine ATS wins marking the most for any season. It went 9-1 ATS in 2013, 9-2 ATS in 2017, and 9-3 ATS in 2016. The algorithm went 6-0 ATS in 2011.If the dog is priced as a double-digit one, they have done even better producing a 4-30 SU, but 25-8-1 ATS good for 76% winning bets. 

The Duke Blue Devils (22-3, 14-1 ACC) are set to face off against the Virginia Cavaliers (13-12, 6-8 ACC) in what promises to be an exciting ACC showdown. Despite Duke being the heavy favorite, Virginia has the potential to make this a much closer game than the betting markets reflect. 

Key Matchups to Watch 

Cooper Flagg vs. Isaac McKneely 

Cooper Flagg (Duke): The freshman phenom leads Duke in multiple categories, averaging 19.8 points, 7.5 rebounds, 4.0 assists, 1.6 steals, and 1.2 blocks per game2. 

Isaac McKneely (Virginia): McKneely is a solid floor spacer, averaging 13.7 points, 2.8 rebounds, and 3.0 assists per game. His ability to thrive in catch-and-shoot situations will be crucial for Virginia. 

Tyrese Proctor vs. Andrew Rohde 

Tyrese Proctor (Duke): Proctor is a high-IQ ball handler who logs 12.2 points, 3.4 rebounds, and 2.2 assists per game. He's been on a scoring tear, with at least 16 points in five straight games. 

Andrew Rohde (Virginia): Rohde provides reliable playmaking in the backcourt, leading Virginia with 4.4 assists per game while also contributing 8.9 points. His ability to distribute the ball effectively will be key for the Cavaliers. 

Kon Knueppel vs. Elijah Saunders 

Kon Knueppel (Duke): Knueppel, another talented freshman, averages 13.0 points and 3.6 rebounds per game. His shooting efficiency will be vital for Duke's offense. 

Elijah Saunders (Virginia): Saunders is a junior forward who averages 11.1 points and 5.4 rebounds per game. His presence in the paint will be important for Virginia to counter Duke's inside game. 

Star Players and Their Season Statistics 

Duke Blue Devils 

Cooper Flagg: 19.8 PPG, 7.5 RPG, 4.0 APG, 1.6 SPG, 1.2 BPG2 

Tyrese Proctor: 12.2 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 2.2 APG 

Kon Knueppel: 13.0 PPG, 3.6 RPG 

Virginia Cavaliers 

Isaac McKneely: 13.7 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 3.0 APG 

Andrew Rohde: 8.9 PPG, 4.4 APG 

Elijah Saunders: 11.1 PPG, 5.4 RPG 

Potential for a Close Game 

Virginia has been on a roll, winning three straight games and five of their last seven. They have also posted the same records in ATS results over these spans. Their recent form and home-court advantage at John Paul Jones Arena could help them keep the game competitive. Key matchups, particularly in the backcourt, will be crucial for Virginia to exploit any weaknesses in Duke's defense. 

While Duke's offensive firepower and depth make them the favorites, Virginia's resilience and strategic matchups could make this a much closer game than expected. Keep an eye on how these individual battles play out, as they will likely determine the outcome of this exciting ACC clash. 

SF Austin vs East Texas A&M 
7-Unit bet on SF Austin priced as a 4.5-point favorite. 

Let’s start with a sports betting algorithm that has done extremely well in facing ugly looking underdogs over many seasons. The algorithm has produced a 590-184 SU record and a solid 451-310-13 ATS mark good for 59% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorite priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

The host has lost three consecutive games to conference foes.  

The host is avenging a same-season loss.  

If the host is playing on the same or more days of rest and the total is priced between 145 and 155 points, our road favorites have gone 48-10 SU and 35-21-1 ATS for 63% winning bets.  

The Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks (13-13, 6-9 Southland) are set to face off against the East Texas A&M Lions (3-23, 1-14 Southland) in what is expected to be a one-sided matchup. Despite the Lions' struggles this season, the Lumberjacks have the potential to make this a rout and win by double-digits. 

Key Matchups to Watch 

Matt Hayman vs. Scooter Williams, Jr. 

Matt Hayman (Stephen F. Austin): Hayman has been a standout player for the Lumberjacks, averaging 13.4 points and 4.3 rebounds per game. His scoring ability and leadership on the court will be crucial for Stephen F. Austin. 

Scooter Williams, Jr. (East Texas A&M): Williams, Jr. leads the Lions in scoring, averaging 12.2 points, 3.2 rebounds, and 2.2 assists per game. His performance will be vital for East Texas A&M to stay competitive. 

Nana Antwi-Boasiako vs. Josh Taylor 

Nana Antwi-Boasiako (Stephen F. Austin): Antwi-Boasiako has been a key contributor for the Lumberjacks, especially in the paint, averaging 0.9 made 3-pointers over the last 10 games. His presence inside will be important for Stephen F. Austin. 

Josh Taylor (East Texas A&M): Taylor is a solid performer for the Lions, averaging 4.6 rebounds and 1.2 blocks per game. His defensive presence will be crucial for East Texas A&M. 

Kyle Hayman vs. Khalilq Abdul-Mateen 

Kyle Hayman (Stephen F. Austin): Hayman is coming off a strong performance, scoring 25 points in Stephen F. Austin's recent victory. His offensive prowess will be important for the Lumberjacks. 

Khalilq Abdul-Mateen (East Texas A&M): Abdul-Mateen has been a consistent scorer for the Lions, averaging 10.8 points and 3.4 rebounds per game. His ability to score from beyond the arc will be key for East Texas A&M. 

Star Players and Their Season Statistics 

Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks 

Matt Hayman: 13.4 PPG, 4.3 RPG 

Nana Antwi-Boasiako: 0.9 made 3-pointers per game (last 10 games) 

Kyle Hayman: 25 points in the last game 

East Texas A&M Lions 

Scooter Williams, Jr.: 12.2 PPG, 3.2 RPG, 2.2 APG 

Josh Taylor: 4.6 RPG, 1.2 BPG 

Khalilq Abdul-Mateen: 10.8 PPG, 3.4 RPG 

McNeese vs SE Louisiana 
7-Unit bet on McNeese priced as an 8.5-point favorite. 

Let’s start with a sports betting algorithm that has done extremely well in facing ugly looking underdogs over many seasons. The algorithm has produced a 492-146 SU record and a solid 374-252-12 ATS mark good for 60% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorite priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

The host has lost three consecutive games to conference foes.  

The host is avenging a same-season loss.  

The host is playing on the same or more rest. 

If the favorite has won the last five meetings against this host, they have gone on to a 172-34 SU (83%) and 126-75-5 ATS mark good for 63% winning bets.  

The McNeese Cowboys (20-6, 14-1 Southland) are set to face off against the SE Louisiana Lions (17-9, 11-4 Southland) in what promises to be an exciting Southland Conference matchup. Despite SE Louisiana's strong season, McNeese has the potential to make this a rout and win by double-digits. 

Key Matchups to Watch 

Alyn Breed vs. Sam Hines Jr. 

Alyn Breed (McNeese): Breed has been a standout player for the Cowboys, averaging 17.5 points and 3 rebounds per game. His scoring ability and leadership on the court will be crucial for McNeese. 

Sam Hines Jr. (SE Louisiana): Hines Jr. is a key player for the Lions, averaging 16.8 points and 6.3 rebounds per game. His performance will be vital for SE Louisiana to stay competitive. 

Javohn Garcia vs. Jakevion Buckley 

Javohn Garcia (McNeese): Garcia has been a consistent performer for the Cowboys, averaging 13.1 points and 1.8 assists per game. His ability to score and create opportunities will be important for McNeese. 

Jakevion Buckley (SE Louisiana): Buckley is a reliable scorer for the Lions, averaging 12.9 points and 4.1 assists per game. His playmaking skills will be crucial for SE Louisiana. 

Sincere Parker vs. Jeremy Elyzee 

Sincere Parker (McNeese): Parker is another key contributor for the Cowboys, averaging 10.2 points and 4.5 rebounds per game. His presence in the paint will be important for McNeese. 

Jeremy Elyzee (SE Louisiana): Elyzee has been a solid performer for the Lions, averaging 9.8 points and 4.8 rebounds per game. His defensive presence will be crucial for SE Louisiana. 

Star Players and Their Season Statistics 

McNeese Cowboys 

Alyn Breed: 17.5 PPG, 3 RPG 

Javohn Garcia: 13.1 PPG, 1.8 APG 

Sincere Parker: 10.2 PPG, 4.5 RPG 

SE Louisiana Lions 

Sam Hines Jr.: 16.8 PPG, 6.3 RPG 

Jakevion Buckley: 12.9 PPG, 4.1 APG 

Jeremy Elyzee: 9.8 PPG, 4.8 RPG 

Potential for a Rout 

McNeese has been on a roll, winning four straight games and five of their last seven. Their recent form and depth make them the favorites to win by double-digits. Key matchups, particularly in the backcourt, will be crucial for the Cowboys to exploit any weaknesses in SE Louisiana's defense. 

Alabama State vs Mississippi Valley State 
7-Unit bet on Mississippi Valley State priced as a 17.5-point home underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball sports betting algorithm has done extremely well producing a 5-33 SU (13%) and a 28-10 ATS mark good for 74% winning bets since 2006.The requirements are: 

Bet on underdogs priced between 13.5 and 19.5 points. 

The dog has lost three consecutive games to conference foes. 

The game number is at least the 25th of the season. 

The favorite is coming off an upset road win. 

The Alabama State Hornets (11-14, 7-5 SWAC) are set to face off against the Mississippi Valley State Delta Devils (3-22, 1-11 SWAC) in what is expected to be a one-sided matchup. Despite Alabama State being the heavy favorite, Mississippi Valley State has the potential to make this a much closer game (single-digit loss) than the betting markets reflect. 

Key Matchups to Watch 

Ammar Knox vs. Arthur Tate 

Ammar Knox (Alabama State): Knox is a key player for the Hornets, averaging 15.2 points, 1.8 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game. His scoring ability will be crucial for Alabama State. 

Arthur Tate (Mississippi Valley State): Tate leads the Delta Devils in scoring, averaging 10.5 points and 3 rebounds per game. His performance will be vital for Mississippi Valley State to stay competitive. 

CJ Hines vs. Alvin Stredic Jr. 

CJ Hines (Alabama State): Hines has been a consistent performer for the Hornets, averaging 13.9 points over the last 10 games. His ability to score and create opportunities will be important for Alabama State. 

Alvin Stredic Jr. (Mississippi Valley State): Stredic Jr. is a key contributor for the Delta Devils, averaging 9.7 points and 5.1 rebounds per game. His presence in the paint will be crucial for Mississippi Valley State. 

Antonio Madlock vs. Greg Moore 

Antonio Madlock (Alabama State): Madlock is coming off a strong performance, scoring 20 points in Alabama State's recent victory. His offensive prowess will be important for the Hornets. 

Greg Moore (Mississippi Valley State): Moore has been a solid performer for the Delta Devils, contributing 14 points in their last game. His scoring ability will be key for Mississippi Valley State. 

Star Players and Their Season Statistics 

Alabama State Hornets 

Ammar Knox: 15.2 PPG, 1.8 RPG, 2.4 APG 

CJ Hines: 13.9 PPG (last 10 games) 

Antonio Madlock: 20 points in the last game 

Mississippi Valley State Delta Devils 

Arthur Tate: 10.5 PPG, 3 RPG 

Alvin Stredic Jr.: 9.7 PPG, 5.1 RPG 

Greg Moore: 14 points in the last game 

Creighton vs St. Johns 
7-Unit bet on Crieghton priced as a 5.5-point underdog. 

I like a 7-Unit bet getting the 5.5 points and a 1-unit amount on the money line.  

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has gone 13-30 SU and 28-15 ATS for 65% winning bets over the past 5 seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on road underdogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

The dog is coming off a loss priced as the favorite.  

The favorite is coming off a loss by three or fewer points to a conference foe.  

If this game is game number 20 or more of the season, our dogs have gone 9-15 SU and 16-7 ATS for 67% winning bets. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has gone 16-31 SU and 32-14-1 ATS for 70% winning bets over the past 6 seasons. The requirements are: 

Bet on road dogs priced between 3.,5 and 9.5 points. 

That road team is coming off an upset road loss to a conference foe. 

The opponent lost to a conference foe by three or fewer points in their previous game. 

South Carolina vs Florida 
7-Unit bet on South Carolina priced as a 14.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 19-43 SU and 40-20-2 ATS record good for 67% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: 

Bet on underdogs priced between 10 and 19.5 points. 

They have lost their last three games all to conference foes. 

The opponent is coming off an upset road win. 

No. 1 Auburn vs No. 2 Alabama 
10-Unit bet on Auburn priced as a 2-point underdog. 

What a monster matchup this game is with No.1 Auburn traveling to Tuscaloosa to take on No.2 Alabama. The home team in a matchup of top five programs that are priced between the 3’s and the total is 150 or more points have gone just 4-11 SUATS for 27% winning bets. Top 10 home teams facing a foe that ranked better than them in the recent polls, priced between the 3’s and with a total of 150 or more points have gone 7-15 SU ATS. 

The favorite in a matchup of top 3 teams have gone 61-45 SU but 46-60 ATS for 43% winning bets but if that favorite is the weaker ranked team they have gone just 5-14 SU and 3-16 ATS.  

The stage is set for an epic showdown as the No. 1 ranked Auburn Tigers (22-2, 10-1 SEC) travel to Tuscaloosa to face the No. 2 Alabama Crimson Tide (21-3, 10-1 SEC) on Saturday, February 15, 2025. This historic matchup marks the first-ever No. 1 vs. No. 2 meeting among SEC teams and promises to be a thrilling contest with significant implications for both teams. 

Betting Trends and Angles 

Spread: Alabama is favored by 1.5 points. 

Over/Under: The total points for the game is set at 172.5. 

Moneyline: Alabama is -135, while Auburn is +110. 

Recent Performance: Alabama has covered the spread in 10 of its last 13 games, while Auburn has only covered the spread once in its last six Saturday games. 

Key Matchups and Requirements for Auburn 

Johni Broome vs. Grant Nelson: Auburn's All-American forward Johni Broome, averaging 18.1 points per game, will be a key player. He needs to dominate the paint and exploit Nelson's tendency to pick up fouls. 

Defensive Pressure on Mark Sears: Auburn must hound Alabama's veteran guard Mark Sears, who averages 17.8 points per game but also has a high turnover rate. Forcing turnovers and preventing Sears from getting comfortable will be crucial. 

Three-Point Defense: Auburn boasts the best 3-point defense in the SEC, allowing opponents to shoot just 28.8% from beyond the arc. Limiting Alabama's three-point shooting will be essential to their success. 

Utilizing Denver Jones: Jones, who makes 43.8% of his threes, should be given opportunities to shoot early and often to stretch Alabama's defense and create space for Broome in the paint. 

Ramifications for the Winning Team 

SEC Conference Standings: The winner of this game will take sole possession of first place in the SEC standings, gaining a valuable upper hand in the race for the conference regular season title. 

National Polls: A victory will likely secure the No. 1 spot in the national polls for the winning team, solidifying their status as the top team in the country5. 

March Madness Seeding: The winner will strengthen their resume for the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA Tournament, which could provide a more favorable path through March Madness 

UCONN vs Seton Hall 
7-UNIT Bet on Seton Hall priced as a 14.5-point home underdog. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 5-47 SU and 36-16 ATS record good for 69% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are:  

Bet on underdogs priced at 13.5 or more points.  

They have lost their last three games to conference foes.  

They are playing on three or more days of rest.  

The opponent is coming off an upset road win. 

Washington vs Penn State 
7-Unit bet on PSU priced as a 6.5-point favorite. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 69-34 ATS mark good for 67% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on home favorites priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. 

They have lost to the spread by 24 or more points over their previous three games. 

The opponent has played OVER the total by 42 or more points spanning their previous 5 games. 

Drexel vs William and Mary 
7-Unit bet on W&M priced as a 3.5-point favorite. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 29-6 SU and 27-8 ATS mark good for 77% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on home favorites priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. 

They have lost to the spread by 24 or more points over their previous three games. 

The opponent has played OVER the total by 42 or more points spanning their previous 5 games. 

Our team lost to the spread by fewer than 10 points in their previous game. 

Houston vs Arizona 
7-Unit bet on Arizona priced as a 1.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 31-52 SU and 52-30-1 ATS mark good for 63.4% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on home underdogs priced at 9.5 or fewer points. 

They are facing a foe that has won 80% or more of their games. 

That foe has seen their last 10 games play OVER the total by a combined 48 or more points. 

If the game number is 20 or more of the regular seasons has seen our home team go 14-17 SU and 21-10 ATS good for 68% winning bets.  

St. Louis vs Loyola 
7 ET 
8-Unit bet on St. Louis priced as a 2.5-point underdog 

The following sports betting algorithm has produced a 107-62 ATS record good for 63% winning bets over the past five seasons.The requirements are: 

Bet on a team that makes 65 to 69% of their free throws. 

The opponent has made between 65 and 69% of their free throws. 

The opponent is coming off a hot shooting game in which they made 13 or more three-pointers. 

So, shooting regression is expected by Loyola tonight. They made 18 three-point shots on 44 attempts in their 87-80 overtime win at Richmond. This was the season-high and exceeded the previous high of 14 made 3’s against a much weaker Eureka team in game three of their season. 

San Francisco vs Gonzaga 
7-Unit bet on San Francisco priced as a 14.5-point underdog. 

The following basketball betting algorithm has produced a 40-27 ATS mark good for 60% winning bets. The requirements are: 

Bet on the road team in a conference game. 

The total is 140 or more points. 

The line is priced between 11.5 and 17 points. 

The road team has forced 13 or fewer turnovers in five consecutive games. 

The host has forced fewer than 11 turnovers in three consecutive games. 

The game occurs after the 15th game of the season. 

Key Matchups Favoring Gonzaga 

Graham Ike vs. San Francisco's Defense: Graham Ike has been a dominant force for the Bulldogs, averaging 19.1 points per game over the last 10 games. His ability to score in the paint will be crucial against San Francisco's defense, which has struggled to contain opponents in the paint3. 

Ryan Nembhard vs. San Francisco's Backcourt: Ryan Nembhard leads Gonzaga in assists, averaging 9.8 per game. His playmaking ability will be pivotal in breaking down San Francisco's defense and creating scoring opportunities for his teammates. 

Gonzaga's Three-Point Shooting vs. San Francisco's Perimeter Defense: Gonzaga averages 7.7 made three-pointers per game. If they can exploit San Francisco's perimeter defense, which allows opponents to shoot 32.6% from beyond the arc3, it could be a game-changer. Look for players like Nolan Hickman to make an impact from downtown. 

From the Predictive Model: 
However, this is just too many points based on my predictive model’s projections calling for San Francisco to shoot 45% or better form the field and have 17 or fewer turnovers. In past games when San Francisco has been priced as a double digit dog and meeting these projections has seen them go 5-13 SU and 15-3 ATS for 83% winning bets. 

San Diego vs Pepperdine 
7-Unit bet on Pepperdine priced as a 8-point favorite. 

The following NCAA basketball betting algorithm has produced an exceptional 28-18 SU and 29-16-1 ATS record for 64.4% winning bets since 2015. The requirements for this bet are: 

Bet on home teams. 

That home team has seen them lose to the spread by 50 to 60 points spanning their last 10 games. 

The opponent has seen their last five games play OVER by 30 or more points. 

The total is priced between 145 and 155 points. 

Kings vs Pelicans 
8-Unit bet on the Pelicans priced as 8-point underdogs. 

This is the sconed of the home and home series in which the home team plays the same team two straight times. Home teams that lost and failed to cover the spread in the first game bounce back with a 16-17 SU and 22-11 ATS record for 67% winning bets. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced an 18-33 record and a 34-17-3 ATS record good for 67% winning bets over the past six seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on underdogs priced between 5.5 and 10.5 points.  

The dog has allowed 115 or more points in five consecutive games.  

The opponent has scored 115 or more points in each of their last two games. 

Cal vs Duke 
7-Unit bet on Cal priced as a 23.5-point underdog. 

Supporting this bet on the Bears is the following algorithm that has gone 2-58 SU and 37-23 ATS for 62% winning bets since 2018. The requirements are:  

Bet on underdogs of 10 or more points.  

Our dog is coming off a double-digit loss to a conference foe.  

The opponent is coming off a road upset loss 

The total is 142.5 or lower. 

If our dog is playing on the road, their record has been 32-16 ATS for 67% winners.  

Tonight, the California Golden Bears (12-12) will face off against the Duke Blue Devils (20-3) at Cameron Indoor Stadium. This is the first ACC meeting between these two programs, and it promises to be an intriguing matchup. 

Key Matchups 

Jeremiah Wilkinson vs Tyrese Proctor: Wilkinson has been the most consistent scorer for Cal, averaging 19.8 points over the last six games. Proctor, on the other hand, is coming off a season-high 23 points against Clemson and has been shooting nearly 40% from beyond the arc. 

Andrej Stojakovic vs Cooper Flagg: Stojakovic, who averages 17.9 points per game, will be up against Flagg, who leads Duke in points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks. This matchup will be crucial in determining the game's outcome. 

Betting Trends and Angles 

Spread: Duke is favored by 23.5 points. The Blue Devils have covered the spread in 23 of their last 36 games, while Cal has covered in 9 of their last 14 away games3. 

Total Points: The over/under is set at 142.5 points. Duke ranks top-five in both adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency, while Cal has hit the team total over in 19 of their last 31 games3. 

Recent Results 

Duke: The Blue Devils are coming off a 77-71 loss to Clemson, which snapped their 16-game winning streak. Despite the loss, Duke remains a dominant force in the ACC. 

California: The Golden Bears have lost three of their last four games, including a 76-66 defeat to Wake Forest. Injuries have plagued Cal throughout the season, affecting their overall performance5. 

Requirements for California to Keep It Close 

Control the Pace: Cal needs to slow down the game and limit Duke's fast-break opportunities. By grinding the game to a halt and focusing on half-court sets, they can minimize Duke's scoring chances. 

Offensive Rebounding: Cal ranks 27th nationally in offensive rebounding percentage. They need to capitalize on second-chance points to stay competitive. 

Limit Turnovers: Taking care of the basketball is crucial. Cal has struggled with turnovers, and they must minimize live-ball turnovers to prevent easy points for Duke. 

Free Throws: Cal is 17th nationally in free throws made per game. They need to get to the line frequently and convert their free throws to keep the game within reach. 

While Duke is heavily favored, these strategies could help California keep the game within a 20-point margin. Enjoy the game!

Canisius vs Niagara 
7-Unit bet on Niagara priced as a  

The following college basketball betting algorithm has produced a 49-29 SU and 49-26-1 ATS record for 65% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are: 

Bet on any team coming off an upset win to a conference rival priced as a 6 or greater-point dog.. 

Their opponent is coming off back-to-back double-digit road losses. 

Tonight, the Canisius Golden Griffins (2-21) will face off against the Niagara Purple Eagles (9-14) at Gallagher Center in Lewiston, New York. The game is set to tip off at 6:30 PM EST and will be broadcast on ESPN+. 

Recent Results 

Canisius: The Golden Griffins are on a five-game losing streak, with their most recent loss coming against Merrimack by a score of 69-51. They have struggled throughout the season, with a 2-10 record in MAAC play. 

Niagara: The Purple Eagles have won two of their last three games, including a close 76-75 victory over Quinnipiac. They currently hold a 4-8 record in MAAC play. 

Key Matchups 

Paul McMillan IV vs Olumide Adelodun: McMillan IV is the leading scorer for Canisius, averaging 20.1 points per game. Adelodun, on the other hand, is a key player for Niagara, averaging 10.1 points and 5.4 rebounds per game. 

Tana Kopa vs Jaeden Marshall: Kopa is a sharpshooter for Canisius, averaging 12.7 points per game and shooting 42.4% from beyond the arc. Marshall has been consistent for Niagara, averaging 10.2 points over the last 10 games. 

Betting Trends and Angles 

Spread: Niagara is favored by 8.5 points. Canisius has struggled to cover the spread, with a 4-7 record as underdogs by 8.5 points or more. 

Total Points: The over/under is set at 136.5 points. Both teams have had games that exceeded this total, with Niagara and its opponents scoring more than 136.5 combined points in 10 games this season. 

Requirements for a Niagara Win 

Defensive Pressure: Niagara needs to maintain their strong defensive performance, holding opponents to 70.3 points per game. Limiting McMillan IV's scoring opportunities will be crucial. 

Rebounding: The Purple Eagles must dominate the boards, as Canisius ranks last in the MAAC in rebounds per game. Controlling the glass will limit second-chance points for the Golden Griffins. 

Efficient Shooting: Niagara should capitalize on their shooting efficiency, as they are shooting 44.9% from the field this season. Consistent scoring from Adelodun and Marshall will be key. 

Given these factors, Niagara has the potential to secure an easy double-digit win over Canisius tonight. 

Enjoy the game!

Air Force vs UNLV 
8-Unit bet on AF priced as a 14-point underdog. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 78-399 SU (16%) and a 270-196-1 ATS record good for 58% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are:  

Bet on road underdogs that have lost their last two games by double-digits.  

Both losses were to conference foes.  

They are avenging a same season loss.  

If our dog is priced between 11.5 and 17.5 points, has produced a 115-66-2 ATS record for 64% winning bets. 

No. 4 Tennessee vs No. 14 Kentucky 
10-Unit bet on Tennessee priced as a 3-point road favorite. 

Except for newcomers Texas and Oklahoma to the SEC, Kentucky has played the fewest home games priced as an underdog with only 13, among the 16 teams in the conference. Next in line is the Florida Gators having played 20 and Arkansas and Tennessee both with 36 home games priced as a dog. Kentucky has gone 6-7 SU and 8-5 ATS for 63% winning bets since 2006. Nine of these games were against aranked foe in which they went 2-6 SU and 4-4 ATS and all these opponents were ranked in the top10 at the time of the game. 

Team Records and Streaks 

Tennessee Volunteers: 

Straight-Up (SU) Record: 20-4 overall, 7-4 in SEC play. 

Against the Spread (ATS) Record: 15-9. 

Current Streak: The Volunteers are on a two-game winning streak, having recently defeated Missouri and Oklahoma. 

Kentucky Wildcats: 

Straight-Up (SU) Record: 16-7 overall, 5-5 in SEC play. 

Against the Spread (ATS) Record: 12-8. 

Current Streak: The Wildcats snapped a two-game losing streak with a decisive 80-57 victory over South Carolina. 

Key Matchups 

Chaz Lanier (Tennessee) vs. Otega Oweh (Kentucky): 

Lanier is Tennessee's leading scorer, averaging 17.7 points per game. His ability to score from anywhere on the court makes him a constant threat. 

Oweh, Kentucky's top scorer, averages 16 points per game and is known for his defensive prowess. This matchup will be crucial in determining the game's outcome. 

Zakai Zeigler (Tennessee) vs. Jaxson Robinson (Kentucky): 

Zeigler is a versatile guard who averages 13.2 points, 6.1 assists, and 2.2 steals per game. His playmaking ability will be key for Tennessee. 

Robinson, who has stepped up in the absence of Lamont Butler, will need to continue his strong play at the point guard position. 

Igor Milicic Jr. (Tennessee) vs. Amari Williams (Kentucky): 

Milicic Jr. has been on an offensive tear, averaging 16 points and 7.7 rebounds over the last three games. His inside presence will be vital for the Volunteers. 

Williams leads Kentucky in rebounding with 8.8 boards per game and will need to control the paint to give the Wildcats an edge. 

Team Statistics 

Tennessee Volunteers: 

Points Per Game: 74.8 

Points Allowed Per Game: 59.3 

Rebounds Per Game: 35.1 

Assists Per Game: 16.0 

Kentucky Wildcats: 

Points Per Game: 86.7 

Points Allowed Per Game: 76.6 

Rebounds Per Game: 33.3 

Assists Per Game: 16.9 

Game Prediction 

From the predictive model, Tennessee is expected to score at least 76 points and have 12 or fewer turnovers. In past games when Tennessee was avenging a same-season loss, scored 76 or more points, and had 12 or fewer turnovers has produced a 9-1 ATS record for 90% winning bets. 

East Texas A&M vs McNeese State 
8-Unit Bet on ETAM priced as a 19.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 78-399 SU (16%) and a 270-196-1 ATS record good for 58% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are:  

Bet on road underdogs that have lost their last two games by double-digits.  

Both losses were to conference foes.  

They are avenging a same season loss.  

If our dog is priced between 11.5 and 20 points and they lost the previous game to the current foe has r3esulted in a solid 130-76 ATS record good for 63% winning bets. 

Raptors vs Rockets 
8-Unit bet on the Rockets priced as 9-point favorites. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 38-51 SU and 56-33-1 ATS for 63% winning bets since 2016. The requirements are:  

Bet on a team coming off three consecutive road losses.  

That team is play on no rest.  

The opponent has a winning record.  

Temple vs Memphis 
8-Unit bet on the OVER priced at 156.5 points. 
8-Unit Bet on Temple priced as 13.5-point underdogs. 

Consider betting 7-units on the Ove4r and 7 units on Temple and 2-units on a parlay betting Temple +13.5 points and OVER 156.5 points. 

The following NCAA basketball betting algorithm has produced a 56-26 OVER record good for 68% winning bets. The requirements are: 

Bet the OVER. 

The home team has won 15 or more of their past 20 games. 

That team has won 80% or more of their games. 

The opponent has a winning record. 

The total is priced between 150 and 160 points. 

Alabama vs Arkansas 
8-Unit bet on Arkansas priced as a 4.5-point underdog. 

The following college basketball betting algorithm has produced a 22-40 SU and 40-21-1 ATS record good for 66% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on home dogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. 

The road team has seen the Over exceed the total by 48 or more points spanning their 10 previous games.  

The road team has won 80% or more of their games. 

Pacers vs Lakers 
8-Unit bet on the Pacers priced as a 4.5-point favorite. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced an exception record going 134-44 SU and 115-60-3 ATS for 67% winning bets since 1995. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorites.  

The opponent has won 67% or fewer of their games on the season.  

The opponent led by 20 or more points at the half in their previous game.  

If our road team is playing this game in the second half of the season (after game number 41) they have gone 70-18 SU for 80% and 61-26-1 ATS for 70% winning bets since 1995. 

Rhode Island vs George Mason 
8-Unit bet on Rhode Island priced as a  

The following college basketball betting algorithm has produced a 70-36-1 ATS record good for 66% winning bets since 2019. The requirements are: 

Bet on road underdogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. 

The home team has scored 65 or fewer points in three consecutive games. 

The road team has played two games that each had 155 or more points scored. 

St. Johns vs UCONN 
8-Unit bet on St. Johns priced as a 2.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA basketball betting algorithm has produced a 19-31 SU and 31-17-2 ATS record good for 65% winning bets since 2006. The requirements needed to validate a betting opportunity are: 

Bet on a home favorite ranked in the top 25. 

The road underdog is ranked in the top 25. 

The home team has covered the spread in three or fewer of their last 11 games. 

The favorite is playing with more rest than the opponent. 

The total is 140 or more points. 

Public Betting: 64% of public bettors are backing UConn. 
ATS Records: St. John's has a solid 14-8-0 record against the spread this season, while UConn is 6-11 ATS when favored by at least 2.5 points. 
Recent Performance: St. John's is on a nine-game winning streak, while UConn has won three of its last four games. 

Matchups and Requirements for St. John's Upset Win 

To pull off the upset, St. John's will need to: 

Control the Paint: UConn's Solo Ball and Alex Karaban are key scorers, so St. John's must limit their impact inside. 

Defensive Intensity: St. John's has a strong defensive rating and must maintain this intensity to disrupt UConn's offensive flow. 

Rebounding: Dominating the boards will be crucial for St. John's to limit UConn's second-chance points. 

Balanced Offense: St. John's needs contributions from multiple players, especially RJ Luis Jr., Zuby Ejiofor, and Kadary Richmond 

Key Players and Statistics 

RJ Luis Jr. (St. John's): Averaging 17.4 points, 6.6 rebounds, 2.4 assists, and 1.4 steals per game. 

Zuby Ejiofor (St. John's): Leading the team with 14.3 points, 8.3 rebounds, 1.0 assists, and 1.7 blocks per game. 

Solo Ball (UCONN): Averaging 15.0 points, 11 rebounds, and 3.5 assists per game. 

Alex Karaban (UCONN): Also averaging 15.0 points, 5.5 rebounds, and 2.0 assists per game. 

Warriors vs Lakers 
8-Unit bet on the Warriors priced as 7-point underdogs. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 59-73 record and 83-46-3 ATS record good 64.3% winning bets over the past six seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on road dogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

The total is 225 or more points.  

Both teams have posted a scoring differential between –3 and +3 PPG.  

The opponent scored 120 or more points in their previous game.  

If the matchup features teams from the same conference our dogs have gone 42-42 SU and 56-27-1 ATS good for 68% winning bets since 2019. 

Bellarmine vs Northern Florida 
8-Unit bet on Northern Florida priced as a 11-point favorite. 

The following NCAA basketball betting algorithm has produced a 42-11 SU (79%) and 32-18 ATS mark for 64% winning bets since 2021. The requirements are:  

Bet on favorites that are coming off a win by three or fewer points.  

The opponent has allowed 85 or more points in their two previous games.  

If our favorite is priced between 1.5 and 11.5 points, they have gone 30-8 SU and 26-12 ATS good for 68% winning bets. In addition, if our favorite has won the last two meetings against the foe, they have gone 11-1 SU and 10-2 ATS for 83% winning bets. 

NC State vs California 
8-Unit bet on the NC State priced as a 2.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA betting algorithm has produced a 78-399 SU (16%) and a 270-196-1 ATS record good for 58% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: 

Bet on road underdogs that have lost their last two games by double-digits. 

Both losses were to conference foes. 

They are avenging a same season loss. 

If our dog is priced between pick-em and 9 points and lost the previous meeting against the current opponent priced as the favorite, they bounce back with a solid 55-30-5 ATS record good for 65% winning bets.  

Magic vs Kings 
8-Unit bet on the Magic priced as 6.5-point underdogs. 

I also recommend a split wager consisting of 6.5 units on the spread and 1.5 units using the money line. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced impressive results going 53-55 SU and 67-39-2 ATS (63%) winning bets since 2014 (11 seasons). The requirements are:  

Bet on road underdogs between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

That road team is playing at least their fourth consecutive road game.  

That road team has lost all the previous three road games.  

If our road team is playing on one day of rest exactly, they improve to 33-30 SU and 42-21 ATS for 67% winning bets since 2014. 

Algorithm 2: Betting on underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points that are coming off three consecutive road losses and now facing a non-conference foe has gone 53-55 SU and 67-39-2 ATS for 63% winning bets over the past 10 seasons.  

If our team has a losing record and the foe has a winning record, our dogs have gone 27-20 SU and 33-12-2 ATS for 73% winning bets over the past 10 seasons. 

Wizards vs Nets 
8-Unit bet on Nets priced as a 2-point favorite. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has done very well posting a 114-46 SU and 105-52-3 ATS record for 67% winning bets over the past five seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on home teams.  

That home team has allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games.  

The opponent is coming off a game in which they scored 120 or more points.  

Algorithm 2: Betting on teams that have allowed 105 or fewer points in each of their last two games and now facing a foe that scored 120 or more points in their previous game have gone 114-46 SU (71%) and 105-52-3 ATS for 67% winning bets over the past five seasons.  

The New Jersey Nets (17-33) will host the Washington Wizards (8-41) tonight at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York. Tip-off is set for 7:30 PM ET. The Nets are slight favorites, favored by 2.5 points, with an over/under of 217 points. 

Betting Trends and Angles 

Nets Betting Trends: The Nets have struggled against the spread (ATS) this season, with a 26-23-1 record. They have covered the spread only twice in four opportunities when favored by 2 points or more3. Their games have gone over the point total 24 times this season. 

Wizards Betting Trends: The Wizards have a 19-29-1 ATS record this season. They have covered the spread only 19 times in 49 games as underdogs. A total of 25 Wizards games have hit the over this season. 

Matchups and Requirements for Nets to Win 

Exploit Youth and Inexperience: The Wizards are one of the youngest teams in the league. The Nets should capitalize on this by using their experienced players like D'Angelo Russell and Nic Claxton to control the game. 

Balanced Scoring Attack: The Nets have relied on a balanced scoring attack recently. Players like Keon Johnson, Tosan Evbuomwan, and Ziaire Williams will need to step up and contribute consistently. 

Defend Jordan Poole: Jordan Poole has been a standout player for the Wizards, averaging 20.3 points per game. The Nets will need to focus on containing him, likely assigning Ziaire Williams to slow him down. 

Rebound and Control the Paint: The Nets need to dominate the interior, outscoring the Wizards in the paint and securing rebounds to limit second-chance opportunities for Washington. 

Holy Cross vs Army 
8-Unit bet on Holy Cross priced as a 5.5-point underdog.  

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has gone 13-29 SU and 28-14 ATS for 67% winning bets over the past 5 seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on road underdogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

The dog is coming off a loss priced as the favorite.  

The favorite is coming off a loss by three or fewer points to a conference foe.  

If this game is game number 20 or more of the season, our dogs have gone 9-13 SU and 15-7 ATS for 68% winning bets. If our dog is facing a conference foe they have gone 7-7 SU and 10-4 ATS for 71.4% winning bets. 

Pacers vs Blazers 
8-Unit bet on the Pacers priced as a 5-point favorite. 

The following NNBA betting algorithm has produced a 122-41 SU (75%) and a 94-68-1 ATS good for 58% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are: 

Bet on road favorites of 4.5 or more points. 

The game occurs in the second half of the season. 

The favorite has won more games but not more than 20% more games as measured by win percentage. 

The total is 225 or more points. 

Clippers vs Lakers 
8-Unit bet on the Clippers priced as an 8.5-point favorite. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 60-16 SU and 51-24-1 ATS record good for 68% winning bets over the past 7 seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on favorites priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

They are on a two or more-game ATS losing streak.  

They have won 50 to 60% of their games.  

The opponent has a winning record. 

Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2025,Venue: Intuit Dome, Inglewood, CA Tipoff: 10:00 PM ET 

Blockbuster Trade: Lakers Acquire Luka Dončić 

In a stunning move that has sent shockwaves through the NBA, the Los Angeles Lakers have acquired Luka Dončić from the Dallas Mavericks in exchange for Anthony Davis. While Dončić is currently sidelined with a calf injury and won't make his debut in this game, his presence looms large over the Lakers' future prospects. 

Key Matchups Favoring the Clippers 

James Harden vs. LeBron James: The battle between these two superstars will be pivotal. Harden, averaging 21.5 points, 5.8 rebounds, and 8.4 assists, will look to exploit the Lakers' defense. LeBron, coming off a triple-double performance against the Knicks, will undoubtedly be a force to reckon with. 

Ivica Zubac vs. Lakers' Frontcourt: Zubac has been a consistent performer for the Clippers, averaging 13.2 points and 10.3 rebounds over his last 10 games. His matchup against the Lakers' frontcourt will be crucial in controlling the paint and securing rebounds. 

Norman Powell vs. Austin Reaves: Powell, leading the Clippers in scoring with 24.1 points per game, will face off against Reaves, who has been averaging 19.5 points over his last 10 games. This matchup will be key in determining the offensive output for both teams. 

Notre Dame vs FSU 
8-Unit bet on Notre Dame priced as a 2.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has gone 24-51 SU and 46-29 ATS for 61.3% winning bets over the past 5 seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on road underdogs. 

The dog is coming off a loss priced as the favorite.  

The favorite is coming off a loss by three or fewer points to a conference foe.  

If this game is game number 20 or more of the season, our dogs have gone 22-49 SU and 44-27 ATS for 62% winning bets. 

Buffalo vs Toledo 
8-Unit bet on Buffalo priced as a 13.5-point underdog. 

The following college basketball betting algorithm has produced an 7-78 SU and 56-29 ATS record good for 66% winning bets since 2006. The requirements are:  

Bet on double-digit road dogs.  

The dog has been outscored by 8 or more PPG.  

They are facing a foe that has posted a scoring differential between –3 and +3 PPG.  

The favorite has seen their last two games combine for a total of 155 or more points in each game 

If the game takes place from game number 15 on out, these big dogs have gone 3-40 SU and 31-12 ATS for 72% winning bets since 2006. 

Magic vs Warriors 
8-Unit bet on the Magic priced as a 3-point dog. 

The following NBA Basketball betting algorithm has produced a 54-37 SU (59%) record and a 57-31-3 ATS record good for 65% winning bets since 2018. The requirements are:  

Bet on road teams avenging a same-season loss to the host.  

The road team is coming off two road losses priced as favorites.  

If the game occurs in the second half of the season, these road teams have gone 37-22 SU and 37-21-1 ATS goods for 64% winning bets if our team is coming off a road loss, they have gone 14-8 SU and 15-7 ATS good for 68% winning bets. 

Pacers vs Jazz 
8-Unit bet on the Jazz priced as 7-point underdogs. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 133-200 record and 198-132-3 ATS record good 60% winning bets over the past six seasons. The requirements are:  

Bet on underdogs priced between 3.5 and 7.5 points. 

Facing a team that scored 120 or more points in each of their last two games.  

If the foe is allowing 47% or worse shooting, then our team has gone on to a 38-32 SU and 44-25-1 ATS record good for 64% winning bets. If our dog is playing at home, they have a produced a highly profitable 19-15 SU (56%) and a 25-9 ATS record good for 74% winning bets that have covered the spread by an average of 7.38 PPG.  

The Indiana Pacers (27-20) will face the Utah Jazz (11-36) tonight at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City at 9:00 PM ET. The Pacers are looking to extend their three-game win streak, while the Jazz aim to build on their recent upset victory over the Orlando Magic. 

Betting Trends and Angles 

Moneyline: Pacers are favored at -275, while the Jazz are at +225. 

Spread: Pacers are favored by 6.5 points. 

Over/Under: The total is set at 238.5 points. 

Recent Performance: The Pacers have been impressive, winning 11 of their last 13 games. They have scored at least 132 points in three straight games2. The Jazz, on the other hand, snapped an eight-game losing streak with their win over the Magic. 

ATS Trends: Pacers are 10-3 ATS in their last 13 games, while the Jazz are 4-5 ATS in their last nine games. 

Matchups to Watch 

Pacers' Offense vs. Jazz's Defense: The Pacers have been scoring at a high rate, averaging 119.9 points per game over their last 10 outings. The Jazz will need to step up their defensive game to contain Indiana's offensive firepower. 

Lauri Markkanen vs. Myles Turner: Markkanen has been Utah's leading scorer with 19.4 points per game, while Turner has been a defensive anchor for the Pacers. This matchup will be crucial for both teams. 

Tyrese Haliburton vs. Collin Sexton: Haliburton has been averaging 18.3 points and 8.6 assists for the Pacers, while Sexton has been Utah's top scorer with 22 points per game in recent games. Their duel will be key to the game's outcome. 

Requirements for Jazz to Pull Off the Upset 

Strong Defense: The Jazz must replicate their defensive performance from the game against the Magic, holding Indiana to under 120 points. 

Efficient Offense: Utah needs to capitalize on their offensive opportunities and shoot efficiently from the field. 

Limit Turnovers: The Jazz must take care of the ball and limit turnovers to prevent the Pacers from capitalizing on fast-break opportunities. 

Rebounding: Winning the battle on the boards will be crucial for Utah to control the game's tempo and limit second-chance points for the Pacers. 

Texas A&M Corpus Christi vs East Texas A&M 
8-Unit bet on TAM Corpus Christi priced as a 7.5-point road favorite. 

The following NCAA basketball betting algorithm has produced a 72-21 SU (77%) and a 62-31 ATS record good for 67% winning tickets since 2006. This betting opportunity is defined by the following situations of these teams. 

Bet on favorites priced between 2.5 and 9 points. 

The game is at least the 16th one played during the regular season. 

The favorite is coming off a road loss priced as a favorite. 

The opponent is coming off a win by 20 or more points. 

If our favorite is priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points they have soared to a highly profitable 63-12 SU (84%) and 53-22 ATS record good for 71% winning bets. 

Grizzlies vs Bucks 
8-Unit Bet on the Bucks priced as 3-point favorites. 

Betting on teams priced between a 3.5-point favorite and a 3.5-point underdog that lost their last two games priced as a favorite and lost the previous meeting to the current foe has earned a solid 55-27 ATS record for 67% winning bets since 2016. If our team is priced as a favorite of 5.5 or fewer points including pick-em has led them to a solid 47-24-1 ATS for 66% winning bets since 2016. 

Colorado vs TCU 

8-Unit bet on Colorado priced as a 6.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball algorithm has produced a 70-38-1 ATS record good for 65% winning bets since 2020. The requirements are: 

Bet on dogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. 

That dog has lost three straight games to a conference foe. 

The opponent is coming off a humiliating road loss in which the scored fewer than 60 points. 

Wizards vs Wolves 
8-Unit bet on the Wizards priced as 16-point underdogs. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 38-83 SU record and a 76-44-1 ATS mark good for 63% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are:  

Bet on road teams that have lost the last three meetings to the current foe.  

That road team is coming off a double-digit home loss.  

If our road team is priced as a double-digit underdog, they have gone 36-15-1 ATS for 71% winning bets and if our dog is playing with two days or more of rest, they have gone 9-1-1 ATS for 89% winning bets over the past 10 seasons.  
 

Indiana-Purdue vs Youngstown State 
8-Unit bet on the YST priced as an 10.5-point favorite. 

The following NCAA basketball betting algorithm has produced a 44-10 SU (82%) and 35-19 ATS mark for 65% winning bets since 2021. The requirements are:  

Bet on favorites that are coming off a win by three or fewer points.  

The opponent has allowed 85 or more points in their two previous games.  

If our favorite is priced between 1.5 and 11.5 points, they have gone 30-7 SU and 26-11 ATS good for 70% winning bets. In addition, if our favorite has won the last two meetings against the foe, they have gone 12-1 SU and 10-3 ATS for 77% winning bets. 

Celtics vs Pelicans 
8-Unit bet on the Celtics priced as an 11-point favorite. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 41-4 SU record and 30-15 ATS record good for 67% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are:  

Bet on double-digit road favorites.  

Facing a host that saw the Over win by 20 or more points in their last game.  

If the total of the game is 220 or more points, these teams have gone 33-4 SU and 26-11 ATS good for 70% winning bets. 

Bulls vs Raptors 
8-Unit bet on the Bulls priced as four-point underdogs. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a8=17 SU (32%) and 19-6 ATS good for 76% winning bets since 2014. The requirements are: 

Bet on road underdogs. 

The game occurs in the second half of the regular season. 

Our dog has seen the total play Under by 58 or more points over their last 10 games. 

The opponent has covered the spread by 75 or more points over their previous 10 games. 

If a conference road dog, our team has gone 14-4 ATS for 78% winning bets. 

UCSD vs Hawaii 
8-Unit bet on UCSD priced as an 7.5-point favorite. 

The following NCAA basketball betting algorithm has produced a 15-12 SU (56%) and 19-6-2 ATS mark for 76% winning bets since 2020. The requirements are: 

Bet on winning record underdogs. 

The opponent has won 51 to 60% of their games. 

The opponent has lost to the spread by 18 or more points spanning their previous three games. 

If our dog is playing on four or fewer days of rest, they have gone 12-8 SU, and 14-4-2 ATS for 78% winning bets. 

Cleveland vs Atlanta 
8-Unit bet on the Cavs priced as a 10-point favorite. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 61-5 SU (92%) and 46-19-1 ATS good for 71% winning bets since 1996. The requirements are: 

Bet on double-digit favorites. 

That favorite lost to the current opponent by double-digits in their previous meeting. 

Our team is coming off a road win. 

Our team scored 110 or more points in their previous game. 

Maine vs New Hampshire 
8-Unit bet on Maine priced as a 13.5-point favorite over New Hampshire. 

The following NCAA basketball betting algorithm has produced a 41-9 SU (81%) and 32-18 ATS mark for 64% winning bets since 2021. The requirements are:  

Bet on favorites that are coming off a win by three or fewer points.  

The opponent has allowed 85 or more points in their two previous games. 

 If our favorite is priced between 1.5 and 13.5 points, they have gone 25-6 SU and 23-8 ATS good for 74% winning bets. In addition, if our favorite has won the last two meetings against the foe, they have gone 11-1 SU and 10-2 ATS for 83% winning bets. 

Nevada vs Boise State 
8-Unit bet on Nevada priced as an7.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has gone 16-30 SU and 32-13-1 ATS for 71% winning bets over the past 6 seasons. The requirements are: 

Bet on road underdogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5-points. 

Our dog is coming off a loss priced as the favorite to a conference foe. 

The home team is coming off a loss by three or fewer points to a conference foe. 

If this game is game number 20 or more of the season, our dogs have gone 11-13 SU and 18-5 ATS for 78% winning bets.  

Cavs vs Heat 
8-Unit bet on the Cavs priced as 8-point favorites. 

This NBA betting algorithm has produced a 67-46 SU (59%) and 70-40-3 ATS record for 64% winning bets over the past 10 seasons.  

Bet on road teams priced as the favorite.  

The road team is coming off a road loss that went into overtime.  

The total is 210 or more points. 

Raptors vs Wizards 
8-Unit bet on the Raptors priced as a 6.5-point favorite. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has earned a 29-4 SU (88%) and 20-11-2 ATS good for 65% winning bets over the past six seasons. The requirements are: • 

Bet on any road favorites of 4.5 or more points.  

The home team has returned from a 3 or more-game road trip.  

The home team plays in the Eastern Time Zone.  

The home’s last game was played in the Pacific Time Zone. 

Loyola Marymount vs Bucknell 
8-Unit bet on LMU priced as a 4.5-[point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has gone 16-30 SU and 32-13-1 ATS for 71% winning bets over the past 6 seasons. The requirements are: 

Bet on road underdogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5-points. 

Our dog is coming off a loss priced as the favorite to a conference foe. 

The home team is coming off a loss by three or fewer points to a conference foe. 

If this game is game number 20 or more of the season, our dogs have gone 11-13 SU and 18-5 ATS for 78% winning bets. 

Jazz vs Warriors 
8-Unit bet on the Jazz priced as a 10.5-point underdog. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced a 38-82 SU record and a 76-43-1 ATS mark good for 64% winning bets since 2015. The requirements are:  

Bet on road teams that have lost the last three meetings to the current foe.  

That road team is coming off a double-digit home loss.  

If our road team is priced as a double-digit underdog, they have gone 37-17-1 ATS for 79% winning bets. If the game occurs in the second half of the regular season they have gone 27-12-1 ATS for 69% winning bets. 

Lakers vs 76ers 
8-Unit bet on the Lakers priced as a 3.5-point favorite. 

If this line moves towards pick-em consider betting the money line. 

The following betting algorithm has produced a 52-8 SU record and a 45-14-1 ATS mark for 76% winning bets since 2017. The requirements are:  

Bet on road favorites.  

The opponent is coming off a road win priced as a dog.  

The favorite defeated the current opponent by double-digits in a same-season previous game. 

Kentucky vs Tennessee 
8-Unit bet on Kentucky priced as an 8.5-point underdog. 

The following NCAA Basketball betting algorithm has gone 13-29 SU and 28-14 ATS for 67% winning bets over the past 5 seasons. The requirements are: 

Bet on road underdogs priced between 3.5 and 9.5 points. 

The dog is coming off a loss priced as the favorite. 

The favorite is coming off a loss by three or fewer points to a conference foe. 

If this game is game number 20 or more of the season, our dogs have gone 9-13 SU and 15-7 ATS for 68% winning bets.  

Bucks vs Jazz 
8-Unit bet on the Jazz priced as a 9-point underdog. 

The following NBA betting algorithm has produced impressive results going 53-53 SU and 67-37-2 ATS (64.4%) winning bets since 2014 (11 seasons). The requirements are:  

Bet on road underdogs between 3.5 and 9.5 points.  

That road team is playing at least their fourth consecutive road game.  

That road team has lost all the previous three road games.  

If our road team is playing on one day of rest exactly, they improve to 33-30 SU and 42-21 ATS for 67% winning bets since 2014.