• Free Picks
  • Premium Picks
  • Handicapper Leaderboards
  • Odds
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
  • Member Login

Register for an Account Now for Free Picks and More Special Offers!

Alex Smart Basketball Totals Picks
Date Match Up Rating Score Result Profit Lead Time Analysis
12-20-23 South Dakota State v. Wyoming UNDER 147 65-78 Win 100 9 h 47 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

 Play under

12-20-23 Baylor v. Duke UNDER 154 70-78 Win 100 9 h 57 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-20-23 Longwood v. North Carolina Central OVER 136.5 70-79 Win 100 5 h 2 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

CBB Home teams against the total (NC CENTRAL) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (60 or more  shots/game), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 33% or less are 35-9 OVER L/26 seasons for a 80% conversion rate for bettors with the combined average score of 154.8 ppg scored. 

Play over

12-19-23 Suns v. Blazers UNDER 233 104-109 Win 100 13 h 22 m Show

The Suns run the 27th ranked pace in the NBA , and rank 13th in defensive rating efficiency. Meanwhile, the Blazers rank 24th in pace and 29th in offensive scoring. With Portland on tired legs as they play their 3 rd game in 4 nights, Im expecting their pace and aggression to be at less than optimal . Meanwhile the Suns after an extended home stand will come out here a little bit more rested and will be ready to push down with a more aggressive defensive stance, which is their modus operandi - and that should translate to slower tilt as is projected by both teams pace numbers and tendencies.

PORTLAND is 31-17 UNDER  as a home underdog over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 224.7 ppg scored.

NBA Road teams where the total is greater than or equal to 220 (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a losing team are 43-17 L/27 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 221.9 ppg. 

Play under

12-19-23 Southern Utah v. Montana State OVER 144.5 88-89 Win 100 16 h 53 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

CBB Road teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (SOUTHERN UTAH) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after playing a game where both teams score 80 points or more are 38-12 OVER L/5 seasons for a 76% conversion rate for bettors.

Play over

12-19-23 Florida v. Michigan UNDER 158.5 106-101 Loss -110 3 h 10 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-18-23 Murray State v. Arkansas-Little Rock OVER 151 66-80 Loss -110 11 h 4 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

ARK-LITTLE ROCK is 22-10 OVER  versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average ofg 158.3 ppg scored. ARK-LITTLE ROCK is 6-0 OVER  after allowing 80 points or more this season with a combined average of 172.6 ppg scored. (Beat Texas SA 93-84 last time out)

CBB Road teams against the total (MURRAY ST) - after 3 straight losses by 6 points or less against opponent after playing a game where both teams score 80 points or more are 31-7 OVER L/26 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 154.9 ppg. 

CBB Road teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (MURRAY ST) - after scoring 55 points or less against opponent after scoring 85 points or more are 28-6 OVER L/5 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 163.9 ppg. 

Play over

12-18-23 Duquesne v. Bradley OVER 142.5 69-67 Loss -110 10 h 24 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

DUQUESNE is 9-1 OVER  in road games versus teams who attempt 21 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 159.5 ppg scored. DUQUESNE is 16-4 OVER  in road games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 148.1 ppg scored.DUQUESNE is 9-0 OVER  in all neutral court lined games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 151.1 ppg scored.

BRADLEY is 7-1 OVER  after a non-conference game this season with a combined average of 144.4 ppg scored. 

CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (BRADLEY) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team are 111-53 OVER L/5 seasons with the average combined score of 150.8 ppg scored.

Play over

12-17-23 North Carolina A&T v. Jackson State UNDER 156 60-68 Win 100 11 h 25 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-17-23 UTEP v. Abilene Christian OVER 139.5 82-88 Win 100 7 h 45 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play over

12-17-23 UL - Lafayette v. McNeese State OVER 140 72-74 Win 100 7 h 44 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

CBB Home teams against the total (MCNEESE ST) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (60 or more  shots/game), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 33% or less are 34-9 OVER L/26 seasons for a 79% conversion rate with the average ppg diff clicking in at 155 . 

Play over

12-17-23 Oregon v. Syracuse UNDER 146.5 63-83 Win 100 3 h 28 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-16-23 Texas Southern v. North Carolina A&T UNDER 145 79-85 Loss -110 13 h 50 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-16-23 West Virginia v. Massachusetts UNDER 147 79-87 Loss -110 10 h 48 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-16-23 Arizona v. Purdue UNDER 160 84-92 Loss -110 8 h 35 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-16-23 Ball State v. Indiana State UNDER 155 72-83 Push 0 5 h 53 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-16-23 Georgia Tech v. Penn State UNDER 148 82-81 Loss -110 3 h 9 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-15-23 Connecticut v. Gonzaga UNDER 154 76-63 Win 100 6 h 4 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-14-23 Louisiana-Monroe v. Lamar OVER 143 73-97 Win 100 12 h 43 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

LAMAR is 7-1 OVER in all lined games this season with a combined average of 158.1 ppg scored. 

Both previous meetings in this series went over the total.

Play over 

12-14-23 Furman v. Tulane UNDER 172.5 110-117 Loss -110 10 h 24 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-13-23 Creighton v. UNLV UNDER 153.5 64-79 Win 100 13 h 14 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-13-23 Texas-San Antonio v. Arkansas-Little Rock UNDER 164 84-93 Loss -110 12 h 36 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-13-23 Boston University v. Dartmouth OVER 128.5 54-63 Loss -110 11 h 12 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play over

12-13-23 Norfolk State v. Stony Brook OVER 140.5 78-84 Win 100 10 h 4 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play over

12-13-23 Incarnate Word v. Rice UNDER 159 57-80 Win 100 4 h 48 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-12-23 Lakers v. Mavs UNDER 236 125-127 Loss -110 15 h 34 m Show

My projections estimate a combined score in the 230s which gives us a one to two possession advantage to the under. The Lakers are currently playing a top tier brand of defensive hoops, as was evident by holding down the run and gun Indiana Pacers to just 109 points to win the in season tournament. Previous to that game the Lakers held the Pelicans to 89 points , and have allowed an average of just 106.3 ppg in their L/5 overall. After their big win last time out, Im also expecting the Lakers to be in a bit of an emotional letdown state, and to be maybe a little less aggressive offensively which adds up to a lower scoring affair against another side that likes to run and gun.

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (LAKERS/DALLAS) - well rested team - playing 4 or less games in 10 days, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) are 41-7 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 86% conversion rate for bettors.

Play under

12-12-23 Louisiana-Monroe v. Sam Houston State OVER 139 62-63 Loss -110 13 h 18 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

SAM HOUSTON ST is 13-5 OVER after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 140.4 ppg scored.

LA-MONROE is 15-6 OVER L/21 after 3 straight games committing 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 145.4 ppg scored. Richard is 38-26 OVER  versus sub standard shooting teams - making 42% or less  of their shots as the coach of LA-MONROE .

CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (SAM HOUSTON ST) - terrible shooting team (40.5% or less) against an excellent defensive team (40.5% or less) are 40-13 OVER L/5 seasons with a combined average of 151.6 ppg scored. 

Play over

12-12-23 Monmouth v. Seton Hall OVER 141.5 61-70 Loss -110 13 h 1 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

After suffering consecutive losses Im betting on the Hall being very aggressive here, and to put forward a start to finish effort to will help this combined score get eclipsed. SETON HALL is 7-0 OVER  after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 149.3 ppg scored.

Play over 

12-11-23 Delaware v. Robert Morris OVER 144 73-69 Loss -111 10 h 34 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

CBB Road teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (DELAWARE) - after beating the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a good team (60% to 80%) playing a team with a losing record are 26-6 OVER L/5 seasons for a 81% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average 152.1 ppg. 

CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ROBERT MORRIS) - excellent free throw shooting team (73% or more ) against an average free throw shooting team (65-69%), after a game where a team made 20% of their 3 point shots or worse are 52-27 OVER L/5 seasons for a 68% conversion rate. with a combined average of 149.6 ppg scored.

Play on the over

12-10-23 Boston College v. St. John's UNDER 151.5 86-80 Loss -110 8 h 33 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Grant is 16-5 UNDER L/21 vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 7+ per game in all games  he has coached with a combined average of 125.2 ppg scored..

CBB neutral court teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (BOSTON COLLEGE) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more, with 2 more starters returning from last year than opponent are 33-12 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 73% conversion rate for bettors. 

Play under

Play under

12-10-23 Colorado v. Miami-FL UNDER 153.5 90-63 Win 100 5 h 2 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

COLORADO is 24-11 UNDER   versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 4+ points/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 136 ppg scored. COLORADO is 15-3 UNDER L/18in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more 2 straight games with a combined average of 139.8 ppg scored.


MIAMI is 9-2 UNDER  in road games off a home win over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 142.9 ppg scored.

CBB  teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (MIAMI) - after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better against opponent after a game - shooting 57% or higher, allowing 43% or lower are 42-14 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 75% conversion rate for bettors.

Play under

12-10-23 Prairie View A&M v. Iowa State OVER 141 56-107 Win 100 4 h 7 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

IOWA ST is 8-1 OVER  when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 145.6 ppg scored.

PRAIRIE VIEW A&M is 10-1 OVER after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 157 ppg scored. PRAIRIE VIEW A&M is 21-9 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 149.5 since 1997 with a combined average of 149.2 ppg scored.

CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (PRAIRIE VIEW A&M) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games are 57-22 OVER L/5 seasons for a 72% conversion rate. 

Play over

12-09-23 Pacers v. Lakers UNDER 242.5 109-123 Win 100 11 h 43 m Show

 Los Angeles after smothering the Pelicans last time out ( allowing them just 89 points in. a big time victory)  will  once again be ready  to control an Indiana offense that has been the best in the NBA all season. Indiana leads the league with a 128.4 points-per-game average, but the senior laden Lakers Im betting have a plan to slow down the Pacers, and this will result in a much lower scoring tilt that the linesmakers are expecting. The Los Angeles Lakers have hit the Game Total Under in 33 of their last 49 games at home (+15.40 Units / 29% ROI)

NBA  teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) are 43-13 UNDER L/27 seasons for. a 77% conversion rate for bettors. 

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (LA LAKERS) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) are 30-6 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors.

Play under

12-09-23 Drake v. Nevada UNDER 147.5 72-53 Win 100 1 h 49 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under (Late Steam)

12-09-23 Marshall v. Ohio UNDER 162 74-69 Win 100 8 h 47 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

CBB teams where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points (OHIO U) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss are 23-2 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 92% conversion rate with a combined average of 148.2 ppg scored.

Play under

12-09-23 Indiana v. Auburn UNDER 147 76-104 Loss -110 5 h 2 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-09-23 Kentucky v. Pennsylvania UNDER 154.5 81-66 Win 100 3 h 51 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

12-08-23 Fairleigh Dickinson v. Manhattan UNDER 151.5 76-71 Win 100 12 h 35 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections place the combined score to fall into the mid 140 range giving us a viable opportunity to cash a under ticket.

CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (FARLEIGH DICKINSON) - an average team (+/- 3.5 PPG differential) against a terrible team (8 or less PPG differential), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game are 39-12 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 77% conversion rate with the average ppg diff clicking in at 145.1 . 

Play under

12-08-23 Stonehill v. Rider UNDER 148.5 56-73 Win 100 11 h 21 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

STONEHILL is 9-1 UNDER  versus poor shooting teams - making 42% or less  of their shots over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 126.8 ppg scored,STONEHILL is 16-5 UNDER versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting 18 free or less throws/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 131.6 ppg scored. 

 RIDER is 12-3 UNDER after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 134.2 ppg scored.

CBB  teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (RIDER STONEHILL) - after 4 or more consecutive losses, in a game involving two struggling  teams (20% or less ) are 51-19 UNDER L/26 seasons with the combined average of 136.7 ppg scored. 

Play under

12-07-23 Eastern Kentucky v. NC-Greensboro OVER 145.5 85-87 Win 100 11 h 52 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Hamilton is 30-18 OVER when the total is 140 to 149.5 as the coach of E KENTUCKY.Hamilton is 14-5 OVER in a road game where the total is 140 to 149.5 as the coach of E KENTUCKY.

CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (UNC-GREENSBORO) - average defensive team (67-74 PPG) against a poor defensive team (74-78 PPG), after a blowout win by 30 points or more are 44-17 OVER L/26 seasons for a 77% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 153 ppg scored. 

Play over

12-07-23 Pacers v. Bucks UNDER 256 128-119 Win 100 9 h 44 m Show

No way do I see Milwaukee allowing the Pacers to run and gun here in comfortable fashion, and instead I expect the Bucks to become very physical in their attempt to slow down this free wheeling group.Yes, I know the numbers attached to this tilt, favor a very high scoring affair, but in my humble opinion the lines-makers have over adjusted towards a public enticing Total.  This Im betting contributes to a combined score that fails to eclipse this total. MILWAUKEE is 29-16 UNDER in road games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.

NBA  teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (MILWAUKEE) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. are 33-11 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 77% conversion rate for bettors.

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (INDIANA) - after scoring 115 points or more 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 125 points or more 2 straight games are 44-19 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 70% conversion rate for bettors. 

Play under

12-06-23 Rice v. Houston OVER 139.5 39-75 Loss -115 14 h 47 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections estimate a score of between 142 to 147 combined points giving us great value with an over wager.


RICE is 7-0 OVER  vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 12+ points/game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 169 ppg scored.Pera is 10-2 OVER  in a road game where the total is 135 to 139.5 as the coach of RICE with a combined average of 147.5 ppg scored.

CBB  Home teams against the total (HOUSTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (60 or more  shots/game), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 33% or less are 33-8 OVER L/26 seasons for a 81% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 156.3 ppg. 

CBB Home teams where the total is between 130 and 139.5 points (HOUSTON) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a losing record are 50-18 OVER L/5 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score coming in at 142.9 ppg. 

_Play over

12-05-23 Florida Atlantic v. Illinois UNDER 147.5 89-98 Loss -105 13 h 21 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Two top tier teams go head to head here in what Im betting will be a physical affair thats see both sides pay special attention to defensive responsibilities in transition.. 

FLA ATLANTIC is 9-1 UNDER L/10 in a neutral court game where the total is 145 to 149.5 with a combined average of 137.2 ppg scored.

ILLINOIS is 20-8 UNDER L/28 after 4 straight wins by 10 points or more with a combined average of 134.7 ppg scored.

CBB Neutral court teams against the total (ILLINOIS) - off an upset win by 15 points or more as an underdog, on Tuesday nights are 32-6 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 84% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score of 130.7 ppg scored. 

Play on UNDER

12-03-23 Creighton v. Nebraska OVER 149.5 89-60 Loss -110 5 h 17 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned.  .

Both these teams can really shoot it. The Bluejays are a potent offensive club, averaging 83.3 points per game while shooting 50 percent from the field and 40 percent from 3-point range. Meanwhile, the Huskers are 13-3 over the last 16 games dating back to Feb. 1, 2023. A big reason for that is NU's offense, as NU has averaged 77.6 ppg on 48 percent shooting in that stretch.Nebraska is currently averaging 81.6 points per game, which is fourth in the Big Ten as of Dec. 1. The last time NU averaged more points per game in its first seven games was in 1995-96 (89.7 ppg).Hoiberg is 10-1 OVER after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of NEBRASKA.Hoiberg is 14-4 OVER  in a home game where the total is 145 to 149.5 as the coach of NEBRASKA.NEBRASKA is 7-0 OVER   after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.

Play over

12-03-23 Fairfield v. Rider UNDER 142.5 88-81 Loss -110 6 h 26 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned.  .

Play under

12-03-23 Auburn v. Appalachian State UNDER 142.5 64-69 Win 100 5 h 27 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned.  .

Play under

12-02-23 Thunder v. Mavs UNDER 235.5 126-120 Loss -110 13 h 41 m Show

Dallas looked exhausted last night in a 108-94 loss to Memphis and now in back to back games will be even more tired and less likely to be in the shape to run and gun with this sometimes explosive visiting  Oklahoma City side. Recently the Mavs have been paying  better attention to D, and as a result have not been as proficient offensively, but it was a problem they needed address. Because of thier better defensive efforts they have seen 4 of their L/5 fail to eclipse the total. Here tonight on tired legs and going against  a Thunder side that can light the scoreboard up in a hurry another more disciplined D plan should be in place, which Im betting results in a lower scoring affair than the linesmakers expect. 

OKLAHOMA CITY is 12-3 UNDER in road games versus sub par defensive teams - allowing 116+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 229.4 ppg scored.

DALLAS is 41-26 UNDER  after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 223.2 ppg scored.

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (DALLAS/OKLAHOMA CITY ) - well rested team - playing 4 or less games in 10 days, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) are 41-5 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 89% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 218.2 ppg scored.

Play under

12-02-23 Washington v. Colorado State UNDER 156 81-86 Loss -110 9 h 44 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned.  .

COLORADO ST is 11-3 UNDER  in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing 14 or less  turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 128.8 ppg.COLORADO ST is 9-2 UNDER  in road games versus good shooting teams - making 45%  or more of their shots over the last 2 seasons.COLORADO ST is 20-9 UNDER  in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing 14 or less turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.COLORADO ST is 7-0 UNDER   in road games after scoring 85 points or more over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 130 ppg scored. 

Hopkins is 21-11 UNDER  in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON with a combined average of 139.1 ppg scored.

CBB Neutral court teams against the total (COLORADO ST) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (80% or better ) playing a team with a winning record.are 167-103 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 62% conversion rate for bettors. 

12-01-23 76ers v. Celtics OVER 224 119-125 Win 100 11 h 41 m Show

 Both of these teams rank in the top five in offensive rating and should easily both top the 109-114 point plateau according to my projections. BOSTON is 12-1 OVER  in home games when they allow 109 to 114 points in a game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 232.7 ppg scored.PHILADELPHIA is 33-20 OVER  after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average with a combined average of 228.1 ppg. 

Play over

11-29-23 Boston University v. Albany OVER 141 72-86 Win 100 14 h 47 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

 CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ALBANY) - after beating the spread by more than 30 points in their previous game, on Wednesday games are 26-5 OVER L/26 seasons for. a 84% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 152.2 ppg.

Play over

11-28-23 Warriors v. Kings UNDER 238.5 123-124 Loss -110 15 h 53 m Show

This is an important tournament game between division rivals , and Im betting it will be a hard fought physical affair that keeps this combined score to the low side of the offered total. 

SACRAMENTO is 25-14 UNDER  when the line is +3 to -3 over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 232.7 ppg scored. 

GOLDEN STATE L/33 vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons has seen a combined average of 229.8 ppg scored.

NBA Home teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (SACRAMENTO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% of their games on the season are 41-9 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 222.5 ppg scored.

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (GOLDEN STATE) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days are 63-30 L/27 seasons for a 68% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 229.9 ppg. 

Play under

11-27-23 Pelicans v. Jazz UNDER 231 112-114 Win 100 11 h 14 m Show

New Orleans enters this game having gone under in their L/4 trips to the hardwood while Utah has gone under 3 straight times. I know New Orleans has been explicit about picking up their defensive play and you can see it in their play, and here tonight in the high altitudes of Salt Lake City Im betting on an even more stringent defensive effort , as their 5th game in a week. Advantage under.

NEW ORLEANS is 11-2 UNDER versus struggling teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 219.3 ppg scored. NEW ORLEANS is 17-6 UNDER  versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of 48% or more  over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 225.4 ppg scored.

NBA Road teams where the total is 220 to 229.5 (NEW ORLEANS) - after going under the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a losing team are 33-5 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 87% conversion rate for bettors with the combined average score of 215.9 ppg scored.

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 220 (UTAH) - good offensive team - scoring 114+ points/game on the season, after trailing their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half are 48-21 UNDER L/5 seasons with a combined average score of 227 ppg going on the score board. 

Play under

11-27-23 Houston Christian v. TCU UNDER 164 64-101 Loss -110 10 h 26 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

TCU can light up the board and name their score here but Houston Christian on flipside wont be able to penetrate a very TCU D, this Im betting  will lead to combined score that does not eclipse this offered total.

TCU is 11-3 UNDER after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 135.9 ppg scored.

CBB Home teams where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points (TCU) - an explosive offensive team (78 PPG or more ) against an average offensive team (67-74 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more 4 straight games are 39-6 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors with the combined average score clicking in at 156.9 ppg scored.

Play on the UNDER

11-26-23 George Washington v. Delaware UNDER 151.5 81-71 Loss -110 4 h 32 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

11-26-23 Canisius v. Bowling Green UNDER 145.5 73-77 Loss -105 4 h 10 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-26-23 North Carolina Central v. Coastal Carolina UNDER 144.5 70-58 Win 100 6 h 55 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-26-23 Brown v. Ohio UNDER 147 77-82 Loss -110 1 h 34 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

11-25-23 Alabama v. Oregon UNDER 160.5 99-91 Loss -109 5 h 39 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-25-23 Canisius v. Western Kentucky UNDER 146.5 85-77 Loss -110 5 h 33 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-24-23 Santa Clara v. Oregon UNDER 146.5 88-82 Loss -110 6 h 12 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

11-24-23 Seton Hall v. Iowa UNDER 155 72-85 Loss -110 10 h 20 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-24-23 Baylor v. Florida UNDER 158 95-91 Loss -111 2 h 13 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

11-24-23 Monmouth v. Belmont UNDER 155.5 93-84 Loss -110 5 h 14 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-24-23 Toledo v. Indiana State UNDER 165.5 74-76 Win 100 6 h 13 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-23-23 Michigan State v. Arizona UNDER 146.5 68-74 Win 100 9 h 41 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections estimate a score in the high 130s to low 140s, giving us an significant possession edge to the under.

Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (ARIZONA) - after scoring 85 points or more, with just one or fewer starters returning from last year in the first 10 games of the season are 40-12 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 137.7 ppg. 

CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points ( MICH ST) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half are 148-71 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 68% conversion rate for bettors with thre average ppg diff clicking in at 141.1 ppg. 

Play under

11-23-23 Colorado State v. Creighton UNDER 154 69-48 Win 100 6 h 47 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-23-23 Villanova v. North Carolina UNDER 146.5 83-81 Loss -110 4 h 30 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-22-23 New Mexico v. Rice UNDER 166.5 90-56 Win 100 7 h 30 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

 Play under

11-22-23 Florida v. Pittsburgh UNDER 157 86-71 Push 0 7 h 19 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

 Play under

11-22-23 Arkansas v. Stanford UNDER 154.5 77-74 Win 100 4 h 47 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

 Play under

11-22-23 Indiana State v. Pepperdine UNDER 159 90-82 Loss -110 3 h 16 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

 Play under

11-22-23 Michigan v. Memphis UNDER 157.5 67-71 Win 100 11 h 59 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-22-23 Loyola-Chicago v. Creighton UNDER 145.5 65-88 Loss -110 11 h 35 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-22-23 Colorado State v. Boston College UNDER 147.5 86-74 Loss -110 7 h 12 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-22-23 Long Beach State v. UL - Lafayette UNDER 151.5 82-92 Loss -110 3 h 24 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-22-23 Appalachian State v. Murray State UNDER 147 67-57 Win 100 7 h 36 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-21-23 Toledo v. New Mexico UNDER 162 84-92 Loss -110 14 h 35 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-21-23 Kansas v. Marquette UNDER 157.5 59-73 Win 100 10 h 7 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-21-23 Jazz v. Lakers OVER 235.5 99-131 Loss -110 15 h 46 m Show

The last four meetings between the Lakers and Jazz have all eclipsed this total with a combined average of 253.25 oog going on the board. My own projections for this contest come in the high 230s to the  low 240s giving us a significant edge to the over. Utah has consistently played run and gun ball with 7 of their L/9 going over the offered number  and Im betting they drag the Lakers into a wide open tilt here today that goes over the digits.Hardy is 10-1 OVER  vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of UTAH with a combined average of 239.3 ppg scored.Ham in 36 games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LA LAKERS has seen a. combined average  of 237.1 ppg go on the board.UTAH in its L/57  as an underdog over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 237.2 ppg scored.UTAH L/22 against Pacific division opponents over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 242 ppg scored. 

Play over

11-21-23 Hofstra v. Wright State UNDER 160.5 85-76 Loss -110 10 h 49 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-21-23 Colorado v. Florida State UNDER 152 71-77 Win 100 3 h 11 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-21-23 Buffalo v. UL - Lafayette UNDER 153.5 60-68 Win 100 4 h 54 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-21-23 Marshall v. Oakland UNDER 149.5 71-78 Win 100 1 h 42 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-21-23 Binghamton v. Sacred Heart UNDER 146.5 75-89 Loss -110 5 h 50 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-19-23 Northern Iowa v. South Florida UNDER 145.5 65-74 Win 100 9 h 21 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned.

My projections estimate a combined score to reach the high 130s which give us a solid 2 to 3 possession edge on this totals offering to the under. 

S FLORIDA is 14-4 UNDER  after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 119.2 ppg scored.

Jacobson  in 184  road games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of N IOWA ihas seen a verage combined score of 127.9 ppg scored. 

CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (N IOWA) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, in a game involving two teams that had marginal losing records (40 to 49%) last season are 40-9 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 82% conversion rate with the average combined score clicking in at 135.6 ppg. 

CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (S FLORIDA) - in a game involving two teams that had marginal losing records (40 to 49%) last season are 182-95 for a 66% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score of 139 ppg going on the board. 

11-18-23 Mavs v. Bucks UNDER 243.5 125-132 Loss -105 12 h 19 m Show

The Dallas Mavericks ranked 4th in pace  have for most of the season run and gun at a high octane rating and Im sure nothing will change here except their oppositions ability to slow them down and grind away with more physical type of game plan. Im looking for a much more grinding type of affair between two strong teams, and a score that remains on the low side of the offered total. My projections estimate a combined score in the high 230s giving a 2 possession plus edge on the number to the under.  MILWAUKEE in their L/25 games home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons have seen a combined average of 234.2 ppg scored. MILWAUKEE in their L/33 in home games versus good shooting teams - making  46% or better  of their shots over the last 2 seasons have seen a combined average of 233 ppg scored.

MILWAUKEE is 29-8 UNDER L/37 in home games off a road blowout win by 20 points or more with a combined average score of 202.8 ppg scored.(Beat Charlotte last time out 130-99)

 DALLAS   in their L/33  non-conference games over the last 2 seasons have seen a combined average of 229.2 ppg scored.

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (DALLAS/ MILWAUKEE) - off a road win, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%)  are 43-9 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 83% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 223.2 ppg. 

NBA eams where the total is greater than or equal to 210 (MILWAUKEE) - after scoring 125 points or more 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 235 points or more 2 straight games are 39-13 L/27 seasons for a 75% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score registering at 227.4 ppg. 

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (MILWAUKEE) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) are 25-5 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 83% conversion rate with the average combined score of 225.6 ppg going on the board.

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (DALLAS) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after allowing 115 points or more 2 straight games are 37-13 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 229.2 ppg. 

NBA teams where the total is greater than or equal to 230 (DALLAS) - off a road win by 10 points or more, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) are 31-6 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 84% conversion rate with the average combined score clicking in at 222.8 ppg scored.

Play under

11-18-23 Southern Indiana v. La Salle UNDER 144.5 78-79 Loss -115 6 h 38 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections estimate a combined score ranging from the high 130s to a maximum of 141 which gives us at least a 1 to 2 possession edge on this number. 

LASALLE is 9-1 UNDER  in all tournament games over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 130.6 ppg scored. 

CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (LASALLE) - after a cover as a double digit favorite, marginal losing team from last season (40% to 49%) playing a team who had a losing record are 35-8 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 82% conversion rate for bettors. 

Play under

11-17-23 San Diego State v. St. Mary's UNDER 131 79-54 Loss -110 10 h 57 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Play under

11-16-23 College of Charleston v. Vermont UNDER 145.5 64-73 Win 100 3 h 31 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

Myrtle Beach Invitational - HTC Center - Conway, SC

My totals projections for this game are in the low 140s giving us a one to two possession edge on this Totals offering. 

COLL OF CHARLESTON is 10-2 UNDER  ) in a neutral court game where the total is 145 to 149.5 with a combined average of 128.8 ppg scored. 

CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (COLL OF CHARLESTON) - first 5 games of the season, after closing out last season strong with 10+ wins in last 12 games, in a game involving two teams that had winning records last season are 62-27 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 70% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score of 138 ppg going on the scoreboard. 

CBB Neutral court teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (VERMONT) - first 5 games of the season, after closing out last season strong with 13+ wins in last 15 games are 54-19 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 74% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score of 135.5 ppg going on the board. 

Play under

11-15-23 Long Island v. UCLA UNDER 142 58-78 Win 100 15 h 24 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

LONG ISLAND is 13-2 UNDER  in a road game where the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 3 seasons.

UCLA is 10-2 UNDER  after allowing 60 points or less 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.

CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (UCLA) - after allowing 55 points or less 2 straight games against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half are 36-6 UNDER L/26 seasons with a combined average of 137.4 ppg scored. 

Play under

11-15-23 Stony Brook v. Nebraska UNDER 141 63-84 Loss -110 7 h 24 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections estimate a combined score in the range of 137. Value to the under by 2 possessions. 

NEBRASKA is 8-1 UNDER when the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 130.9 ppg scored.

STONY BROOK is 9-2 UNDER  versus teams who make 8 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 season with a combined average 131.9 ppg. 

CBB - Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (NEBRASKA) - after allowing 55 points or less 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more are 29-6 UNDER L/27 seasons for a 83% conversion rate with the combined average score of 137 pp scored. 

Play under

11-15-23 Richmond v. Boston College UNDER 142.5 61-68 Win 100 12 h 10 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

RICHMOND is 12-2 UNDER L/14 after a blowout win by 30 points or more.

RICHMOND is 20-9 UNDER after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.

CBB  teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (BOSTON COLLEGE) - marginal losing team from last season (40% to 49%) playing a team who had a losing record are 358-249 L/26 seasons for a 60% conversion rate for bettors. 

CBB eams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (RICHMOND) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, in a game involving two teams that had marginal losing records (40 to 49%) last season are 39-9 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 81% conversion rate with a combined average of 136 ppg scored.

Play under

11-14-23 Iowa v. Creighton UNDER 163.5 84-92 Loss -110 13 h 57 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections estimate a combined score of 156 to 159  giving us solid value by 2 plus possessions to the under on this offering. I know both these sides have shown huge offensive lower tier competition , but now when facing some decent defensive talent a quick regression must be expected. 

IOWA in their L/11 against Big East conference opponents  have seen a combined average of 155.5 ppg scored. 

CREIGHTON is 16-3 UNDER  in home games when playing only their 2nd game in a week over the last 3 seasons with a combined average of 132 ppg going on the board. 

CBB teams where the total is greater than or equal to 160 (IOWA) - good team from last season - outscored opponents by 4 or more points/game, after a blowout win by 30 points or more are 41-18 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 70% conversion rate for bettors. 

CBB teams where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points (CREIGHTON) - off 2 consecutive home wins by 10 points or more against opponent off 2 or more consecutive home wins are 49-16 L/26 seasons for a 74% conversion rate!

Play under

11-13-23 Rider v. Nebraska UNDER 149.5 50-64 Win 100 10 h 0 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections have estimated a combined score in the low to mid 140s range giving us a 2 possession or more edge on this offered totals number.

Baggett is 48-34 UNDER  when the total is 140 to 149.5 as the coach of RIDER with a combined average of 144.6 ppg scored. 

NEBRASKA is 11-2 UNDER  in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 134 ppg scored. NEBRASKA is 32-17 UNDER  as a home favorite of 10 or more points with a combined average of 134.5 ppg scored.

 CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (NEBRASKA) - after allowing 55 points or less 2 straight games against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half are 32-6 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 84% conversion rate for bettors with the average combined score clicking in at 138 ppg. 

Play under

11-13-23 Stephen F Austin v. Northwestern State UNDER 146.5 96-70 Loss -110 12 h 27 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections estimate a combined score in the upper 130s to maximum 141 range giving us a 2 to 3 possession value to the under.

CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (NORTHWESTERN ST) - first 5 games of the season, after closing out last season with 7+ ATS losses in last 8 games. are 35-10 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors with as combined average of 135.2 ppg going on the scoreboard. 

CBB Home teams against the total (NORTHWESTERN ST) - excellent ball handling team from last season - committed 12 or less turnovers/game, in a non-conference game between two teams from weak division 1-A conferences are 29-10 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 75% conversion rate for bettors. 

Play under 

11-13-23 East Tennessee State v. Butler UNDER 147 47-81 Win 100 12 h 44 m Show

  My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

BUTLER is 13-2 UNDER  when the total is 140 to 149.5 over the last 2 seasons with a combined average of 135 ppg scored. 

CBB Home teams against the total (BUTLER) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, marginal losing team from last season (40% to 49%) playing a team who had a losing record are 30-8 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 79% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average for a 79% conversion rate. 

Play under

11-12-23 North Carolina Central v. Georgia UNDER 146 54-64 Win 100 9 h 44 m Show

 My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections estimate a score that hits in the low 140s, which gives us a 1 to 2 possession edge on this totals offering. 


GEORGIA in their L/9 games  as a home favorite of 10 or more points over the last 3 seasons have seen a combined average of 138.5 ppg scored.


Moton is 24-14 UNDER  after a win by 15 points or more as the coach of NC CENTRAL has seen a combined average of 133.3 ppg scored. (Destroyed lower tier VA LYNCGBURG  last time out by a 107-54 count and now should see immediate offensive regression while the D rides the momentum of a top tier defensive effort)

White is 20-8 UNDER  in home games after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached with a combined average of 138.1 ppg scored.

CBB Home teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (GEORGIA) - first 5 games of the season, after closing out last season with 7+ ATS losses in last 8 games are 35-10 UNDER L/5 seasons for a 78% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 135.2 ppg scored. 

Play under

11-11-23 Utah Tech v. Jacksonville State UNDER 144.5 81-79 Loss -110 8 h 31 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies, revenge scenarios and play off seeding desperation  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned. 

My projections make this total out at 139 giving us a 2 to 3 possession value to the under. 

JACKSONVILLE ST is 21-8 UNDER  after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons with a combined average fo 130.1 ppg scored. Harper is 36-24 UNDER  as a home favorite or pick as the coach of JACKSONVILLE ST with a combined average of 139.5 ppg scored..

CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (JACKSONVILLE ST) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, in a game involving two teams that had marginal losing records (40 to 49%) last season with a combined average of 135.5 ppg scored. 

CBB teams where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points (UTAH TECH) - in a game involving two teams that had marginal losing records (40 to 49%) last season are 180-87 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 68% conversion rate with the combined average of 138.5 ppg scored.

Play under

11-10-23 Lakers v. Suns OVER 222.5 122-119 Win 100 14 h 44 m Show

The Lakers have lost two straight and have allowed 120 or more points in 3 of their L/4 and in 5 road games this season have allowed an average of 221.4 ppg. Meanwhile, the Suns have averaged 120.3 ppg at home this season while allowing 117 ppg. After the recent negative results from the Lakers Im betting on a very aggressive take no prisoners effort from them , and for the Suns to reciprocate with some offense fireworks themselves and for this offered total to be eclipsed.

 
Ham is 8-0 OVER  off 2 or more consecutive road losses as the coach of LA LAKERS with a combined average of 240.8 ppg scored. 

The suns have gone over in 5 of their L/6 overall

NBA Home teams where the total is greater than or equal to 220 (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (45.5-47.5%), average ball handling team (14.5-16.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (14.5  or less TO's) are 60-25 over L/5 seasons for a 68% conversion rate for bettors. 

Play over

11-10-23 Arizona v. Duke UNDER 154.5 78-73 Win 100 11 h 14 m Show

My College basketball sides/Totals projections are based on a system I have used for more than 25 years. The system is has been honed and tweaked multiple times during this period, and is now a viable long term profit based way to calculate value based Totals /Sides  offerings from the sports  books. ( Coaching systems, pace, officials ,injuries, road.away dichotomies  are all taken into consideration as is current form  and league wide stats/trends dating backs 37 seasons) In other words no stone is left unturned.  .

My projections for this tilt estimate a combined score that will plateau in the mid to  high 140s giving us a two to 3 plus possession edge on this offered total to the under. 

ARIZONA in their L/152  road games in non-conference games have seen a combined average of 144.4 ppg scored. 

DUKE  in their L/6  home games after allowing 25 points or less in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons have seen a combined average of 144.7 ppg. 

CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (ARIZONA) - after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better against opponent after a game - shooting 57% or higher, allowing 43% or lower are 41-14 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 75% conversion rate with the average combined ppg clicking in at 149.1 ppg. 

CBB Road teams against the total (ARIZONA) - team that had a good record last season (60% to 80%) playing a team that had a winning record, with just one or fewer starters returning from last year in the first 10 games of the season are 101-49 UNDER L/26 seasons for a 67% conversion rate for bettors with a combined average of 136.1 ppg scored.

CBB teams where the total is between 150 and 159.5 points (DUKE) - with four starters returning from last year in the first 5 games of the season, first 5 games of the season, after closing out last season strong with 10+ wins in last 12 games are 30-10 L/26 seasons  for a 75% conversion rate for bettors with the combined average of 146.6 ppg scored. 

Play under

  • PREVIOUS
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • NEXT